You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to test-dev@httpd.apache.org by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org> on 2004/07/27 23:33:19 UTC

Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation

ping

:)

--Geoff

Stas Bekman wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> 
>>> I'm not sure about the name choice. $(TEST_VERBOSE) and $(TEST_FILES)
>>> are the same as other Test packages use. Do they have $TEST_EXTRA_ARGS
>>> too? Otherwise we may better use some name specific to Apache-Test?
>>
>>
>>
>> MakeMaker looks to support only three: TEST_VERBOSE, TEST_FILE(S), and
>> TESTDB_SW.
>>
>> so how about APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS?  it's verbose but it shouldn't be
>> too
>> bad and it beats making tons of extra targets.
> 
> 
> +1
>

Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation

Posted by Geoffrey Young <ge...@modperlcookbook.org>.


Philippe M. Chiasson wrote:
> Geoffrey Young wrote:
> 
>> ping
>>
>> :)
>>  
>>
> Must have fell off my radar. How is the following patch ?

+1

--Geoff

Re: [Patch] add TEST_EXTRA_ARGS to allow passing arguments to t/TEST thru make invocation

Posted by "Philippe M. Chiasson" <go...@ectoplasm.org>.

Geoffrey Young wrote:

>ping
>
>:)
>  
>
Must have fell off my radar. How is the following patch ?

>--Geoff
>
>Stas Bekman wrote:
>  
>
>>Geoffrey Young wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>>I'm not sure about the name choice. $(TEST_VERBOSE) and $(TEST_FILES)
>>>>are the same as other Test packages use. Do they have $TEST_EXTRA_ARGS
>>>>too? Otherwise we may better use some name specific to Apache-Test?
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>
>>>MakeMaker looks to support only three: TEST_VERBOSE, TEST_FILE(S), and
>>>TESTDB_SW.
>>>
>>>so how about APACHE_TEST_EXTRA_ARGS?  it's verbose but it shouldn't be
>>>too
>>>bad and it beats making tons of extra targets.
>>>      
>>>
>>+1
>>
>>    
>>
>
>  
>