You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@tomcat.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2013/09/09 11:36:09 UTC

[Bug 55536] allow to disable Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation - DOS risk

https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55536

Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|---                         |INVALID
                 OS|                            |All

--- Comment #1 from Mark Thomas <ma...@apache.org> ---
http://tomcat.markmail.org/thread/xkxhfdrp6tslwkao

I've yet to see anyone argue that adding rate limiting to SSL renegotiations
for BIO and NIO is a worthwhile exercise. I'm not against it if there is a use
case and I have a few ideas on how it might be done. But, at the moment, I
simply don't see the point.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tomcat.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tomcat.apache.org