You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2021/08/14 11:28:55 UTC
Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
We could at least say "This entry was last updated in 2003"; that'd be
better than having an entry that still claims Neon is an option (it
hasn't been since 1.7.0).
Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 23:04:42 +0200:
> Hi,
>
> Not directly related to this commit but at least in the same FAQ entry, I
> noticed that the link to TortoiseSVN's document describing SSPI
> authentication is no longer working. The actual document is there but the
> the linked section was deleted in 2011 (see
> https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tortoisesvn/trunk/doc/source/en/TortoiseSVN/tsvn_repository/,
> r21241).
>
> It seems the whole FAQ entry should be rewritten, looking at the history it
> seems to be largely unchanged since it was written in 2003.
>
> Unfortunately I don't know enough about this subject to propose anything
> myself.
>
> Kind regards,
> Daniel Sahlberg
>
> Den mån 12 juli 2021 kl 16:46 skrev Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>:
>
> > Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time, so
> > the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling that
> > line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI only
> > allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI.
> >
> > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Author: hartmannathan
> >> Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021
> >> New Revision: 1891416
> >>
> >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416&view=rev
> >> Log:
> >> * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support
> >>
> >> Modified:
> >> subversion/site/staging/faq.html
> >>
> >> Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html
> >> URL:
> >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416&r1=1891415&r2=1891416&view=diff
> >>
> >> ==============================================================================
> >> --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original)
> >> +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021
> >> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio
> >> </pre>
> >>
> >> <p>Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the
> >> user's
> >> -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion
> >> +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion
> >> will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP
> >> library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client never
> >> asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will fail.
> >>
> >>
> >>
Re: svn commit: r1891416 - /subversion/site/staging/faq.html
Posted by Daniel Sahlberg <da...@gmail.com>.
Den lör 14 aug. 2021 kl 13:29 skrev Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>:
> We could at least say "This entry was last updated in 2003"; that'd be
> better than having an entry that still claims Neon is an option (it
> hasn't been since 1.7.0).
>
That is a good idea. I've added a TODO paragraph in r1892340.
Kind regards,
Daniel
> Daniel Sahlberg wrote on Mon, Jul 12, 2021 at 23:04:42 +0200:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Not directly related to this commit but at least in the same FAQ entry, I
> > noticed that the link to TortoiseSVN's document describing SSPI
> > authentication is no longer working. The actual document is there but the
> > the linked section was deleted in 2011 (see
> >
> https://svn.osdn.net/svnroot/tortoisesvn/trunk/doc/source/en/TortoiseSVN/tsvn_repository/
> ,
> > r21241).
> >
> > It seems the whole FAQ entry should be rewritten, looking at the history
> it
> > seems to be largely unchanged since it was written in 2003.
> >
> > Unfortunately I don't know enough about this subject to propose anything
> > myself.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Daniel Sahlberg
> >
> > Den mån 12 juli 2021 kl 16:46 skrev Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>:
> >
> > > Too bad both Neon and Serf support NTLM and SSPI for quite some time,
> so
> > > the reason is a bit outdated... But I would still recommend enabling
> that
> > > line, as there are quite some users that want to mix accounts and SSPI
> only
> > > allows you access with the one configured for NTLM/SSPI.
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 9, 2021 at 9:02 PM <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Author: hartmannathan
> > >> Date: Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021
> > >> New Revision: 1891416
> > >>
> > >> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1891416&view=rev
> > >> Log:
> > >> * site/staging/faq.html: (#sspi): Fix typo: suppport -> support
> > >>
> > >> Modified:
> > >> subversion/site/staging/faq.html
> > >>
> > >> Modified: subversion/site/staging/faq.html
> > >> URL:
> > >>
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/subversion/site/staging/faq.html?rev=1891416&r1=1891415&r2=1891416&view=diff
> > >>
> > >>
> ==============================================================================
> > >> --- subversion/site/staging/faq.html (original)
> > >> +++ subversion/site/staging/faq.html Fri Jul 9 19:02:01 2021
> > >> @@ -1717,7 +1717,7 @@ to see the section on SSPI authenticatio
> > >> </pre>
> > >>
> > >> <p>Without this line, browsers that support SSPI will prompt for the
> > >> user's
> > >> -credentials, but clients that do not suppport SSPI such as Subversion
> > >> +credentials, but clients that do not support SSPI such as Subversion
> > >> will not prompt. (The current release of Neon - Subversion's HTTP
> > >> library - handles only basic authentication.) Because the client
> never
> > >> asks for credentials, any action that requires authentication will
> fail.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
>