You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com> on 2011/03/28 05:37:13 UTC
OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0 or
coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
--
Shawn
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
Just notice your change, so let's leave it as 1.1.0 temporarily now. But
those who testing CDI might need to use 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT to check the TCK
result.
2011/3/31 David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> I set it to 1.1.0, but go for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT if you want.
>
> -David
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew
> there
> > are still some TCK failures
> >
> > 2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb
> >> trunk
> >> pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the
> released
> >> owb 1.1.0 ?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm
> not
> >>> aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if
> there
> >>> are
> >>> and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots,
> >> but
> >>> am happy to do that if that's any help.
> >>>
> >>> Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can,
> >> as
> >>> it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have
> >> API
> >>> changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to
> >>> upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I
> >> guess
> >>> that might influence the decision.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> jeanouii@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
> >>>> Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
> >>>> guess
> >>>> there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a
> >> patch
> >>>> version).
> >>>>
> >>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>> OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released
> >> 1.1.0
> >>>> or
> >>>>> coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have
> >> to
> >>>>> change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Shawn
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Shawn
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>
>
--
Ivan
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I will deploy an 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT now.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Thu, 3/31/11, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
> To: dev@openejb.apache.org
> Date: Thursday, March 31, 2011, 4:15 AM
> I set it to 1.1.0, but go for
> 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT if you want.
>
> -David
>
> On Mar 30, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to
> 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew there
> > are still some TCK failures
> >
> > 2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> >
> >> OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I
> still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb
> >> trunk
> >> pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to
> 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released
> >> owb 1.1.0 ?
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan
> Gallimore <
> >> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I
> get, and commit them. I'm not
> >>> aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB
> trunk, but let me know if there
> >>> are
> >>> and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't
> pushed new OpenEJB snapshots,
> >> but
> >>> am happy to do that if that's any help.
> >>>
> >>> Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB
> 1.1.0 release if we can,
> >> as
> >>> it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots
> are published which have
> >> API
> >>> changes which break our build. Obviously there
> may be other reasons to
> >>> upgrade to the new snapshots - new features,
> TCK compliance etc, so I
> >> guess
> >>> that might influence the decision.
> >>>
> >>> Jon
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis
> MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> As far as I know Jon is already working on
> fixing OWB integration.
> >>>> Don't know the status nor how different
> 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
> >>>> guess
> >>>> there will be no API changes(i guess no
> changes because it's only a
> >> patch
> >>>> version).
> >>>>
> >>>> Jean-Louis
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> >>>>
> >>>>> OWB 1.1.0 is under vote.
> We need to decide to use the released
> >> 1.1.0
> >>>> or
> >>>>> coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and
> geronimo.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for
> a stable TCK env until we have
> >> to
> >>>>> change OWB code to fix
> something. Thoughts ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>> Shawn
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Shawn
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>
>
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
I set it to 1.1.0, but go for 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT if you want.
-David
On Mar 30, 2011, at 8:23 PM, Ivan wrote:
> If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew there
> are still some TCK failures
>
> 2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
>
>> OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb
>> trunk
>> pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released
>> owb 1.1.0 ?
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
>> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not
>>> aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there
>>> are
>>> and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots,
>> but
>>> am happy to do that if that's any help.
>>>
>>> Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can,
>> as
>>> it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have
>> API
>>> changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to
>>> upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I
>> guess
>>> that might influence the decision.
>>>
>>> Jon
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
>>>> Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
>>>> guess
>>>> there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a
>> patch
>>>> version).
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Louis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
>>>>
>>>>> OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released
>> 1.1.0
>>>> or
>>>>> coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
>>>>>
>>>>> I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have
>> to
>>>>> change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Shawn
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ivan
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Ivan <xh...@gmail.com>.
If no objection, I will upgrade the OWB to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT, as I knew there
are still some TCK failures
2011/3/30 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb
> trunk
> pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released
> owb 1.1.0 ?
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not
> > aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there
> > are
> > and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots,
> but
> > am happy to do that if that's any help.
> >
> > Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can,
> as
> > it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have
> API
> > changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to
> > upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I
> guess
> > that might influence the decision.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
> > > Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
> > > guess
> > > there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a
> patch
> > > version).
> > >
> > > Jean-Louis
> > >
> > >
> > > 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > > OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released
> 1.1.0
> > > or
> > > > coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
> > > >
> > > > I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have
> to
> > > > change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Shawn
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
--
Ivan
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>.
OWB 1.1.0 vote passed. But I still see OWB 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT in openejb trunk
pom. Could anyone either upgrade it to 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT or use the released
owb 1.1.0 ?
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 2:55 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not
> aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there
> are
> and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots, but
> am happy to do that if that's any help.
>
> Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can, as
> it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have API
> changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to
> upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I guess
> that might influence the decision.
>
> Jon
>
> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
> > Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
> > guess
> > there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a patch
> > version).
> >
> > Jean-Louis
> >
> >
> > 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> >
> > > OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0
> > or
> > > coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
> > >
> > > I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
> > > change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > --
> > > Shawn
> > >
> >
>
--
Shawn
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I tend to fix any OpenEJB compile errors I get, and commit them. I'm not
aware of any issues currently in OpenEJB trunk, but let me know if there are
and I'll try and help fix them. I haven't pushed new OpenEJB snapshots, but
am happy to do that if that's any help.
Personally I'd be favour of going with the OWB 1.1.0 release if we can, as
it can be a bit problematic when new snapshots are published which have API
changes which break our build. Obviously there may be other reasons to
upgrade to the new snapshots - new features, TCK compliance etc, so I guess
that might influence the decision.
Jon
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>wrote:
> As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
> Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I
> guess
> there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a patch
> version).
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
> 2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
>
> > OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0
> or
> > coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
> >
> > I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
> > change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Shawn
> >
>
Re: OWB 1.1.0 or 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geornimo ?
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
As far as I know Jon is already working on fixing OWB integration.
Don't know the status nor how different 1.1.0 and 1.1.1 will be. But I guess
there will be no API changes(i guess no changes because it's only a patch
version).
Jean-Louis
2011/3/28 Shawn Jiang <ge...@gmail.com>
> OWB 1.1.0 is under vote. We need to decide to use the released 1.1.0 or
> coming 1.1.1-SNAPSHOT in openejb and geronimo.
>
> I prefer to keep the OWB to 1.1.0 for a stable TCK env until we have to
> change OWB code to fix something. Thoughts ?
>
> --
> Shawn
>