You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@cxf.apache.org by "Eugene Berman (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/07/28 00:27:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (CXF-8383) cxf support for vertx destination

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8383?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17572177#comment-17572177 ] 

Eugene Berman commented on CXF-8383:
------------------------------------

Yes, please make Vertx transport supported OOB! I'm working on camel-cxf extension for Quarkus and facing the same problem, no matter what I try, I'm unable to make it work with vertx, this seems to be a showstopper :(

 

> cxf support for vertx destination
> ---------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-8383
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-8383
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Transports
>            Reporter: olivier dufour
>            Priority: Major
>
> Hello,
> I am working on cxf quarkus extension. And quarkus is migrating from servlet to vertx routing system.  Anyway, I try to make a custom detination/conduit but it seems that cxf have tight integration with servlet. I try to make my own invoke with 
> HttpServerRequest req, HttpServerResponse res, RoutingContext ctx
> instead of
> invoke(final ServletConfig config, final ServletContext context, final HttpServletRequest req,
>  final HttpServletResponse resp)
> but when I see that InMessage store servlet request and servlet response as attribute, I am affraid that this not doable. 
> So, Another solution is to do a wrapper httpServletRequest class which wrap the vertx httpserverrequest. 
>  
> Anyway, in term of architecture, why inMessage do not store body, uri, query param, ... instead of the servlet objects (request, context)?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)