You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2012/04/04 03:04:47 UTC
[Bug 6786] New: near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786
Bug #: 6786
Summary: near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
Product: Spamassassin
Version: unspecified
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: Rules
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: lemat@lemat.priv.pl
Classification: Unclassified
few days ago sa-update greatly lowered the scores for TO_EQ_FM* tests:
72_scores.cf:
previous:
score TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX 1.650 0.659 1.650 0.659
score TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT 3.134 3.950 3.134 3.950
score TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY 2.374 3.008 2.374 3.008
current:
score TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
score TO_EQ_FM_DOM_HTML_IMG 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
score TO_EQ_FM_DOM_HTML_ONLY 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
score TO_EQ_FM_DOM_SPF_FAIL 0.001 2.638 0.001 2.638
score TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
score TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001
score TO_EQ_FM_SPF_FAIL 0.001 2.367 0.001 2.367
and I believe something is wrong with that since TO_EQ_FM* are nice enough to
mark the spam I receive
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@pccc.com
--- Comment #2 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@pccc.com> 2012-04-04 12:09:34 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores
> change a few days ago?
>
> Those rules are ranked pretty terribly. Best rules are ranked 1, worst are
> ranked 0:
>
> MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
> 0 0.5257 0.0050 0.991 0.54 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY
> 0 0.3420 0.0017 0.995 0.52 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX
> 0 0.2501 0.0011 0.996 0.51 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT
>
> -
> http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-n&rule=%2FTO_EQ_FM&srcpath=&g=Change
>
> Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus.
It still has a nice S/O, though. I recommend a local scoring higher until we
can get masscheck chugging along!
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786
Lucian Langa <co...@mips.afraid.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |cooly@mips.afraid.org
--- Comment #3 from Lucian Langa <co...@mips.afraid.org> 2012-04-08 23:14:28 UTC ---
I fear I his those because of company generated mails.
I'm not sure but I think mails are constructed using some outdated mail
library.
Anyway this should have been reflected in my corpus earlier, shoudlnt't it ?
I'm not entirely sure how to start checking on those.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786
Lemat <le...@lemat.priv.pl> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |lemat@lemat.priv.pl
--- Comment #4 from Lemat <le...@lemat.priv.pl> 2012-04-11 23:51:04 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> I fear I his those because of company generated mails.
those should match trusted_networks isn't it?
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 6786] near zero score for TO_EQ_FM*
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6786
Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Darxus@ChaosReigns.com
--- Comment #1 from Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> 2012-04-04 04:23:29 UTC ---
A new sa-update hasn't been generated since 2012-02-25, how did your scores
change a few days ago?
Those rules are ranked pretty terribly. Best rules are ranked 1, worst are
ranked 0:
MSECS SPAM% HAM% S/O RANK SCORE NAME WHO/AGE
0 0.5257 0.0050 0.991 0.54 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_ONLY
0 0.3420 0.0017 0.995 0.52 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_DIRECT_MX
0 0.2501 0.0011 0.996 0.51 0.00 TO_EQ_FM_HTML_DIRECT
-
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20120403-r1308758-n&rule=%2FTO_EQ_FM&srcpath=&g=Change
Looks like all the hams hitting those three rules are in llanga's corpus.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.