You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by "Chris DiGiano (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/05/22 15:14:31 UTC
[jira] Commented: (VFS-50) Threading issue with
AbstractFileSystem.fireEvent
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-50?page=comments#action_12412770 ]
Chris DiGiano commented on VFS-50:
----------------------------------
Here's a patch that makes a copy of the listener list to avoid race conditions:
Index: src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/AbstractFileSystem.java
===================================================================
--- src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/AbstractFileSystem.java (revision 408551)
+++ src/java/org/apache/commons/vfs/provider/AbstractFileSystem.java (working copy)
@@ -484,9 +484,12 @@
synchronized (listenerMap)
{
final FileObject file = event.getFile();
- final ArrayList listeners = (ArrayList) listenerMap.get(file.getName());
- if (listeners != null)
+// final ArrayList listeners = (ArrayList) listenerMap.get(file.getName());
+// if (listeners != null)
+ if (listenerMap.containsKey(file.getName()))
{
+ // Make a copy of the listeners to avoid race conditions. (Chris DiGiano)
+ final ArrayList listeners = new ArrayList((ArrayList) listenerMap.get(file.getName()));
final int count = listeners.size();
for (int i = 0; i < count; i++)
{
> Threading issue with AbstractFileSystem.fireEvent
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: VFS-50
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-50
> Project: Commons VFS
> Type: Bug
> Reporter: Chris DiGiano
> Priority: Minor
>
> I make heavy use of DelegateFileObject in my code and recently ran into a threading issue when a change in one file was trying to automatically update dependent DelegateFileObjects. While events where still being propagated, one DelegateFileObject removed itself as an event listener. This caused an index-of-range problem in AbstractFileSystem.fireEvent because the listener list had shrunk, but the "count" had already been fixed.
> It appears that the current implementation of fireEvent is not entirely thread safe, if event handlers can still change the listener list in place. I will attach a patch that works for me.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org