Re: localhost bypass? (spamass-milter)

[Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>]

Thomas S. Crum wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 17:17 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:  
>   
>> To do that, you have to configure your tools to not call SA at all for
>> such messages.
>>     
>
> I see.
>
>   
>> What kind of setup are you using to call SA?
>>     
>
> I am new to sa.  Does spamd sound correct? Maybe spamass-milter? I
> followed a howto and ended up with those in my rc.conf.
>   
That is the tool that's calling SA, thus that's the tool that would have
to bypass SA.. Unfortunately, I know very little about this tool myself.

Hopefully someone else can jump in and help here.

Re: localhost bypass? (spamass-milter) SUCCESS

["Thomas S. Crum" <ts...@aaawebsolution.com>]

Matt, thank you for pointing me away from sa and into the tools.

It turns out spamass-milter is where I needed to fix it... here is what
I did for my system... FreeBSD 5.3

I added the following to /etc/rc.conf

spamass_milter_flags="-f -p ${spamass_milter_socket} -i 127.0.0.1"

Then I restarted spamass-milter with:
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamass-milter.sh restart

Now mail from localhost no longer goes through sa. Hooray.


On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 19:18 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Thomas S. Crum wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-01-01 at 17:17 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:  
> >   
> >> To do that, you have to configure your tools to not call SA at all for
> >> such messages.
> >>     
> >
> > I see.
> >
> >   
> >> What kind of setup are you using to call SA?
> >>     
> >
> > I am new to sa.  Does spamd sound correct? Maybe spamass-milter? I
> > followed a howto and ended up with those in my rc.conf.
> >   
> That is the tool that's calling SA, thus that's the tool that would have
> to bypass SA.. Unfortunately, I know very little about this tool myself.
> 
> Hopefully someone else can jump in and help here.
> 
>