You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@qpid.apache.org by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org> on 2006/11/12 14:45:37 UTC
[jira] Created: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API cahgnes
Implement Mina API cahgnes
--------------------------
Key: QPID-92
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
Project: Qpid
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Java Broker, Java Client
Affects Versions: M1
Reporter: Martin Ritchie
Fix For: M2
See:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=comments#action_12456749 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
------------------------------------
Upgraded to 1.0.1 but we really want 1.2 SNAPSHOT as this is a Java5 build.
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=comments#action_12450060 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
------------------------------------
Changes awaiting M1 Branching
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517274 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
------------------------------------
Should we now be looking to use the new 2.0 version of mina , now that it is approaching a stable platform?
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assignee: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M3
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Marnie McCormack (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Marnie McCormack updated QPID-92:
---------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: M2)
M3
Moving unresolved JIRAs from M2 to M3, in preparation for M2 release.
For this JIRA would suggest that a discussion be held on the dev list as it's been a known issue for a while, and does cause client throttling issues.
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M3
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Resolved: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Martin Ritchie resolved QPID-92.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Later
Need to decide what we are doing about our IO Layer.
Options:
1) Upgrade to latest Mina working with Mina to resolve bug regression
2) Abstract IO Layer so we can substitute alternatives potentially doing 1) at afterwards.
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assignee: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M3
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=all ]
Martin Ritchie reassigned QPID-92:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Martin Ritchie
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Updated: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=all ]
Martin Ritchie updated QPID-92:
-------------------------------
Summary: Implement Mina API changes (was: Implement Mina API cahgnes)
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Carl Trieloff <cc...@redhat.com>.
Daniel Kulp wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the
> Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in the
> next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue
> with the M2 release.
As long as they will be releasing at some point, going ahead at this
stage with snapshots is not
necessarily a bad thing. I would however say that we should try to not
be on a snapshot for a 1.0
or production release. As with milestone releases it is better to be
using the code we need and to
be able to provide feedback and bug fixes back to earlier
I would thus say, go to a version with the stuff we need, and let's get
it tested now, and from my side
I have no issue if M2 also releases with a snapshot ( we have the
process understood for it ). I would
rather have snapshots now than when we do a 1.0 release for example.
Carl.
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Marnie McCormack <ma...@googlemail.com>.
The MINA team are hoping to build a release bu Wed next week fyi.
(I've been following the MINA dev list)
Marnie
On 11/23/06, Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com> wrote:
>
> I fully agree.
>
> On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> >
> > Steve,
> >
> > I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's
> > unless the
> > Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in
> > the
> > next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot
> > issue
> > with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes
> > the
> > bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues
> > when
> > there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non-
> > snapshot
> > version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven
> > repositories)
> >
> > Dan
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> >> I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not
> >> actually cut yet.. no response
> >>
> >> Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us
> >> using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision
> >> 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure
> >> what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the
> >> code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a
> >> single
> >> bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code
> >> would be available but it state where the source came from and what
> >> reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm
> >> new
> >> to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the
> >> software than to let people actually use it. :D
> >>
> >> On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com> wrote:
> >>> Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to
> >>> convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on
> >>> the snapshot maven repository?
> >>>
> >>> --steve
> >>>
> >>> On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote:
> >>>> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?
> >>>> page=comments#action_12452295 ]
> >>>>
> >>>> Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
> >>>> ------------------------------------
> >>>>
> >>>> Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a
> >>>> local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release
> >>>> to use.
> >>>>
> >>>>> Implement Mina API changes
> >>>>> --------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Key: QPID-92
> >>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> >>>>> Project: Qpid
> >>>>> Issue Type: Bug
> >>>>> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> >>>>> Affects Versions: M1
> >>>>> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> >>>>> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> >>>>> Fix For: M2
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> See:
> >>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%
> >>>>> 3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> >>>> -
> >>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> >>>> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
> >>>> Administrators.jspa
> >>>> -
> >>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
> >>>> software/jira
> >
> > --
> > J. Daniel Kulp
> > Principal Engineer
> > IONA
> > P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001
> > daniel.kulp@iona.com
>
>
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com>.
I fully agree.
On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:44 PM, Daniel Kulp wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's
> unless the
> Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in
> the
> next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot
> issue
> with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes
> the
> bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues
> when
> there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non-
> snapshot
> version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven
> repositories)
>
> Dan
>
>
>
> On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote:
>> I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not
>> actually cut yet.. no response
>>
>> Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us
>> using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision
>> 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure
>> what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the
>> code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a
>> single
>> bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code
>> would be available but it state where the source came from and what
>> reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm
>> new
>> to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the
>> software than to let people actually use it. :D
>>
>> On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to
>>> convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on
>>> the snapshot maven repository?
>>>
>>> --steve
>>>
>>> On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote:
>>>> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?
>>>> page=comments#action_12452295 ]
>>>>
>>>> Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
>>>> ------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a
>>>> local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release
>>>> to use.
>>>>
>>>>> Implement Mina API changes
>>>>> --------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Key: QPID-92
>>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
>>>>> Project: Qpid
>>>>> Issue Type: Bug
>>>>> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
>>>>> Affects Versions: M1
>>>>> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
>>>>> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
>>>>> Fix For: M2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> See:
>>>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%
>>>>> 3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
>>>> -
>>>> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
>>>> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
>>>> Administrators.jspa
>>>> -
>>>> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
>>>> software/jira
>
> --
> J. Daniel Kulp
> Principal Engineer
> IONA
> P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001
> daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Daniel Kulp <da...@iona.com>.
Steve,
I still wouldn't move to using the SNAPSHOT with the new API's unless the
Mina team can also commit to producing at least a "beta" release in the
next couple weeks. Otherwise, we could run into the same snapshot issue
with the M2 release. If they can get the 1.0.X release that fixes the
bugs, I would stick with that for M2 and re-examine the API issues when
there is some commitment from them to be able to produce a non-snapshot
version. (a beta would be OK as long as it's uploaded to the maven
repositories)
Dan
On Thursday November 23 2006 12:54 pm, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not
> actually cut yet.. no response
>
> Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us
> using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision
> 463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure
> what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the
> code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a single
> bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code
> would be available but it state where the source came from and what
> reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm new
> to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the
> software than to let people actually use it. :D
>
> On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com> wrote:
> > Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to
> > convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on
> > the snapshot maven repository?
> >
> > --steve
> >
> > On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote:
> > > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?
> > > page=comments#action_12452295 ]
> > >
> > > Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a
> > > local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release
> > > to use.
> > >
> > >> Implement Mina API changes
> > >> --------------------------
> > >>
> > >> Key: QPID-92
> > >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> > >> Project: Qpid
> > >> Issue Type: Bug
> > >> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> > >> Affects Versions: M1
> > >> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> > >> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> > >> Fix For: M2
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> See:
> > >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%
> > >> 3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > > -
> > > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> > > administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
> > > Administrators.jspa
> > > -
> > > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
> > > software/jira
--
J. Daniel Kulp
Principal Engineer
IONA
P: 781-902-8727 C: 508-380-7194 F:781-902-8001
daniel.kulp@iona.com
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Martin Ritchie <ri...@apache.org>.
I have asked them to do a release which they have voted on but not
actually cut yet.. no response
Robert asked them again today if they have any objections with us
using the 1.1.0-Snapshot we were using before which is revision
463149. We should get a response by Monday. .. If not I'm not sure
what that means... It seems very odd that we can't just release the
code.. if it was a c++ application the binary distro could be a single
bin file, with no chance of someone reusing the code. The source code
would be available but it state where the source came from and what
reason.. I would have thought that was enough though IANAL and I'm new
to the whole open source release process. Much easier to write the
software than to let people actually use it. :D
On 23/11/06, Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to
> convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on
> the snapshot maven repository?
>
> --steve
>
> On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote:
>
> > [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?
> > page=comments#action_12452295 ]
> >
> > Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
> > ------------------------------------
> >
> > Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a
> > local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release
> > to use.
> >
> >> Implement Mina API changes
> >> --------------------------
> >>
> >> Key: QPID-92
> >> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> >> Project: Qpid
> >> Issue Type: Bug
> >> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> >> Affects Versions: M1
> >> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> >> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> >> Fix For: M2
> >>
> >>
> >> See:
> >> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%
> >> 3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
> >
> > --
> > This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> > -
> > If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> > administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
> > Administrators.jspa
> > -
> > For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
> > software/jira
> >
> >
>
>
--
Martin Ritchie
Re: [jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by Steve Vinoski <vi...@iona.com>.
Hi Martin, regarding this, has there been any progress in trying to
convince the Mina folks to at least put a new snapshot release up on
the snapshot maven repository?
--steve
On Nov 23, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Martin Ritchie (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?
> page=comments#action_12452295 ]
>
> Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
> ------------------------------------
>
> Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a
> local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release
> to use.
>
>> Implement Mina API changes
>> --------------------------
>>
>> Key: QPID-92
>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
>> Project: Qpid
>> Issue Type: Bug
>> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
>> Affects Versions: M1
>> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
>> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
>> Fix For: M2
>>
>>
>> See:
>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%
>> 3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the
> administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/
> Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/
> software/jira
>
>
[jira] Commented: (QPID-92) Implement Mina API changes
Posted by "Martin Ritchie (JIRA)" <qp...@incubator.apache.org>.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92?page=comments#action_12452295 ]
Martin Ritchie commented on QPID-92:
------------------------------------
Changes commited but the rolled back as cannot use maven to use a local jar. .. Progress pending on decision about what mina release to use.
> Implement Mina API changes
> --------------------------
>
> Key: QPID-92
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-92
> Project: Qpid
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Java Broker, Java Client
> Affects Versions: M1
> Reporter: Martin Ritchie
> Assigned To: Martin Ritchie
> Fix For: M2
>
>
> See:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/mina-dev/200610.mbox/%3c768dcb2e0610182351s43f72bfo2b3cdaf15cac0293@mail.gmail.com%3e
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira