You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by "Andrew Purtell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/07/19 02:32:38 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (HBASE-3300) force delete option for use cases that explicitly set version/timestamp

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3300?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Purtell resolved HBASE-3300.
-----------------------------------

    Resolution: Not a Problem

> force delete option for use cases that explicitly set version/timestamp
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HBASE-3300
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3300
>             Project: HBase
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Kannan Muthukkaruppan
>
> Background: For use cases that explicitly set versions, after a delete, it is not possible to insert values with older versions. So for example if you did a puts (v1) and delete (@ v2), subsequent puts with an older version (e.g., v1) will not take effect since the delete has a higher version.
> {code}
> #1. PUT(row, col, version1,  old-value)
> #2. DELETE(row, col, version2)
> #3. PUT(row, col, version1, new-value)
> {code}
> The row/col stays deleted, and this is expected behavior since the delete has a higher timestamp.
> Feature Request: It would be good to provide a "force" delete mechanism -- something that allows the row or a specific column to be started with a clean slate. i.e. forget about everything that happened to this item earlier, and lets you start afresh. Without this there is no good cleanup mechanism for use cases that set versions explicitly.
> [Note: The only workaround for this depends on a subtle implementation detail that major compactions discard delete markers. So if a major compaction happened between steps #2 & #3, then you would in fact be able to put a value with an older version.]
> Thoughts?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)