You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> on 2022/02/23 15:32:55 UTC
Remove openejb-axis in TomEE 9.x
Hi all,
Trying to move forward with TomEE 9.x
We do have a pretty old openejb-axis. We don't use it by default because we
use CXF. It's used mainly for JAX-RPC which is out of the landscape for EE
9, so I'm tempted to remove it.
Any thoughts?
Wze have more deep dependencies to javax.xml.rpc and it might become harder
to solve.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
Re: Remove openejb-axis in TomEE 9.x
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
In my branch I removed it to simplify migration work and removed all
integration code to support JAX-RPC.
It's took a bit of time, but did not look like work to throw away
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 7:25 PM Jean-Louis Monteiro <
jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
> Well, I'm asking because it somehow blocks me at the minute. I'm not
> saying I can't fix it in another way.
>
> Long story short, it has dependency on javax.xml.rpc which I left
> available in jakartaee-api jar. So far so good. But the JAX-RPC api has
> dependency on other javax.* spec that migrated to jakarta.* namespace.
>
> Of course I could relocate javax.xml.rpc in the jakartaee-api jar to use
> jakarta.xml.rpc instead and do a sed on our sources.
> But that specific namespace is not part of what got moved to jakarta
> namespace. So we would end up with something bad.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:48 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm certainly +1 for pruning it, but would prefer we get the basic
>> javax-jakarta PR merged with a green build and then go about cleaning up
>> stuff like that.
>>
>> I think we could spend several weeks cleaning out things from 9.0 that we
>> don't want or need.
>>
>> That assumes it's possible. Might be something complicating the
>> javax-to-jakarta namespace transition.
>>
>>
>> --
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>> On Feb 23, 2022, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
>> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Trying to move forward with TomEE 9.x
>>
>> We do have a pretty old openejb-axis. We don't use it by default because
>> we
>> use CXF. It's used mainly for JAX-RPC which is out of the landscape for EE
>> 9, so I'm tempted to remove it.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> Wze have more deep dependencies to javax.xml.rpc and it might become
>> harder
>> to solve.
>>
>> --
>> Jean-Louis Monteiro
>> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>>
>>
>>
Re: Remove openejb-axis in TomEE 9.x
Posted by Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com>.
Well, I'm asking because it somehow blocks me at the minute. I'm not saying
I can't fix it in another way.
Long story short, it has dependency on javax.xml.rpc which I left available
in jakartaee-api jar. So far so good. But the JAX-RPC api has dependency on
other javax.* spec that migrated to jakarta.* namespace.
Of course I could relocate javax.xml.rpc in the jakartaee-api jar to use
jakarta.xml.rpc instead and do a sed on our sources.
But that specific namespace is not part of what got moved to jakarta
namespace. So we would end up with something bad.
--
Jean-Louis Monteiro
http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
http://www.tomitribe.com
On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 6:48 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I'm certainly +1 for pruning it, but would prefer we get the basic
> javax-jakarta PR merged with a green build and then go about cleaning up
> stuff like that.
>
> I think we could spend several weeks cleaning out things from 9.0 that we
> don't want or need.
>
> That assumes it's possible. Might be something complicating the
> javax-to-jakarta namespace transition.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <
> jlmonteiro@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to move forward with TomEE 9.x
>
> We do have a pretty old openejb-axis. We don't use it by default because we
> use CXF. It's used mainly for JAX-RPC which is out of the landscape for EE
> 9, so I'm tempted to remove it.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Wze have more deep dependencies to javax.xml.rpc and it might become harder
> to solve.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>
>
Re: Remove openejb-axis in TomEE 9.x
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
I'm certainly +1 for pruning it, but would prefer we get the basic javax-jakarta PR merged with a green build and then go about cleaning up stuff like that.
I think we could spend several weeks cleaning out things from 9.0 that we don't want or need.
That assumes it's possible. Might be something complicating the javax-to-jakarta namespace transition.
--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
> On Feb 23, 2022, at 10:32 AM, Jean-Louis Monteiro <jl...@tomitribe.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Trying to move forward with TomEE 9.x
>
> We do have a pretty old openejb-axis. We don't use it by default because we
> use CXF. It's used mainly for JAX-RPC which is out of the landscape for EE
> 9, so I'm tempted to remove it.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Wze have more deep dependencies to javax.xml.rpc and it might become harder
> to solve.
>
> --
> Jean-Louis Monteiro
> http://twitter.com/jlouismonteiro
> http://www.tomitribe.com