Re: creating a subproject -- how many votes?

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> > So, do we require:
> >   - (a) 3 +1s?  seems a bit low, in my opinion
> >   - (b) a majority of the PMC?   I think this is most appropriate
> >   - (c) 3/4s of the PMC, Jakarta style?  too much.
> > I'm hoping someone can say "oh yeah, we decided on (b) ages ago!"
> > here, btw.
> 
> (a) is 50% of the current PMC
> (b) is 2/3 of the current PMC
> (c) is 5 people of the 6 in the PMC
> 
> So given our current numbers, I think (a) or (b) is appropriate.
> Moving forward, if the PMC numbers grow, I agree that (a) is too small.
> I think requiring 1/2 to 2/3 is a good number.
> 
> BTW, I haven't had the time to read the docs and such regarding the
> specific details, but I'm +1 on the idea of the subproject.

oh good ;)

FWIW, I think I prefer (b) -- a "majority", in other words a smidgen over
1/2.  we now qualify.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFDA/wAMJF5cimLx9ARAkh4AJ9negHmnA5xUiU2CYk2rYBMxYbIMgCeP7xf
DpmPaY1dbJUBnLTT02lFY/c=
=1fKm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----