Re: M1 ?

[Remy Maucherat <re...@apache.org>]

> Hi,
>
> The basic tests seems to be passing on 4 platforms with different
> configurations, I did some load tests and it seems to be reasonably
> stable. There are certainly many small problems that need to be found,
> but overall I things it looks ok.
>
> I would like to tag a first milestone and start using bugzilla to
> track mod_jk2, and start running watchdogs and serious testing.
>
> While some new components may still be added ( like jk_config_registry
> or jk_channel_windows, etc ), the base features should be stable.
> Of course, nothing is perfect, but things are good enough for jk2.0.
>
> What do you think ? Nacho ?
>
> ( so far I tested on linux, solaris, hpux and windows, with 3.3 and
> 4.0 and 4.1 - there are few tricks to get the native code to work )
>
>
> On a related note, we have now code to do chuid on unix - so it
> would be trivial to add an option to change the user id before
> the server starts processing user-code. Also it is reasonably easy
> to get the signals to work - not sure this is that usefull, so
> I'll not spend time on it.

I spent zero time working on the native parts of JK 2, so obviously my
opinion doesn't really count ;-)

I think it's good to start releasing milestones. There's already a
Connector:Coyote JK 2 category in the TC 4 BZ which could be used for that.
Is that good enough ?

So with 4.1.x, what should be the recommended connector ? mod_jk1 or mod_jk2
?

Remy


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>

Re: M1 ?

[co...@covalent.net]

On Fri, 31 May 2002, Remy Maucherat wrote:

> I spent zero time working on the native parts of JK 2, so obviously my
> opinion doesn't really count ;-)

I'll count in the time you spent optimizing jasper :-), so your opinions
matters.


> I think it's good to start releasing milestones. There's already a
> Connector:Coyote JK 2 category in the TC 4 BZ which could be used for that.
> Is that good enough ?

I think so.

> So with 4.1.x, what should be the recommended connector ? mod_jk1 or mod_jk2

mod_jk1 is the stable one, and that should be used and recommended for 
now. 

The java code will work with any mod_jk, so it doesn't matter too much,
is just the configuration of apache that will be different. I already 
started with the web.xml -> workers2.properties generators, and I hope jk2 
config will be much more automated and simpler.

But for now - don't hold 4.1.x releases on mod_jk2.

Costin



--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <ma...@jakarta.apache.org>