You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by Jim Gallacher <jg...@apache.org> on 2006/12/09 17:17:14 UTC
mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
the next couple of days.
Here are the rules:
In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
_this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
me personally).
The files are (temporarily) available here:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.tgz
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.md5
Please download it, then do the usual
$ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
$ make
$ (su)
# make install
Then (as non-root user!)
$ make check
Or for you Windows folks
$ cd test
$ python test.py
And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
the test output, and suggestions, if any).
Please present your test results in the following format:
+1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
For example:
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
extract this information automatically. :)
Thank you for your assistance,
Jim Gallacher
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu>.
These are a bit late, but I'm glad it's working on these systems too...
+1 MacOS 10.4.8 (Intel), Apache 2.0.59 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5
+1 Solaris 10 (Sparc), Apache 2.0.59 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.5
cheers,
Ron
Ron Reisor <ro...@udel.edu> (RWR3)
University of Delaware Information Technologies/Network and Systems Services
Computing Center/192 South Chapel Street/Newark DE, 19716
pgp finger print: 0D 73 06 6F D3 6A 99 D3 F5 D5 6E FF 3B B9 7C 2C
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Clodoaldo <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1 Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
+1 Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
+1 Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
The correct md5 file path is:
http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.tgz.md5
Regards,
--
Clodoaldo Pinto Neto
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Jorey Bump <li...@joreybump.com>.
+1 Slackware Linux 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
If you have a wishlist for any free OS platforms we're missing, I've
gathered a collection of decommissioned machines that I can set up for
testing new releases. I'm in the middle of a move, so I can't do it for
this release, but after the votes are in, let's compile a list of
significant omissions.
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
> me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@lehuen.com>.
Here are the 6 binaries for Windows, three Python versions times 2 Apache
versions.
http://nicolas.lehuen.com/download/mod_python/
Here are the test results :
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
I cannot test on Python 2.3 right now as the installer doesn't really play
well in an environment where Python 2.3, 2.4 and 2.5 are installed. I need
to recover a pristine environment for that. If someone has such an
environment and can perform the tests, please let me know.
Regards,
Nicolas
2006/12/10, Graham Dumpleton <gr...@dscpl.com.au>:
>
> On 10/12/2006, at 3:17 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing.
>
> +1 Apple Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
> (OS Supplied Version)
> +1 Apple Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python
> 2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version)
>
>
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Graham Dumpleton <gr...@dscpl.com.au>.
On 10/12/2006, at 3:17 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing.
+1 Apple Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
(OS Supplied Version)
+1 Apple Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python
2.3.5 (OS Supplied Version)
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably not
> me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.tgz
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.md5
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gr...@apache.org>.
Sorry it took a little long, 3.3.0b is out there, and the web page has
been updated.
The proposed announcement follows, I'll be sending it out some time over
X-Mas, please respond before then if you think something needs to be
added/changed:
Subject: ANNOUNCE: Mod_python 3.3.0 Beta
The Apache Software Foundation and The Apache HTTP Server Project are
pleased to announce the 3.3.0 Beta release of mod_python.
Version 3.3.0b of mod_python features several new functions and attributes
providing better access to apache internals, as well as many bug fixes and
various performance and security improvements. A detailed description of
the changes is available in Appendix A of the mod_python manual, also
available here
http://www.modpython.org/live/mod_python-3.3.0b/doc-html/app-changes-from-3.2.10.html
Beta releases are NOT considered stable and usually contain bugs.
This release is intended to solicit widespread testing of the code. We
strongly recommend that you try out your existing applications and
experiment with new features in a non-production environment using this
version and report any problems you may encounter so that they can be
addressed before the final release.
Preferred method of reporting problems is the mod_python user list
mod_python@modpython.org.
Mod_python 3.3.0b is available for download from:
http://httpd.apache.org/modules/python-download.cgi
For more information about mod_python visit http://www.modpython.org/
Regards,
The Apache mod_python team.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>>
>> I concur - my +1 was for a beta
>
> +1 for 3.3.0 beta
>
> Jim
>
>
>> grisha
>>
>> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Fraser wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not "core" but I think its good practice to officially release this
>>> as a beta to the wider community before making it an actual release.
>>> I didn't test it because I was waiting for the core vote :-)
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>>> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > core +1 on releasing it into the wild
>>>> >
>>>> > grisha
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant
>>>> by "the next level" either. :)
>>>>
>>>> Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and
>>>> so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release?
>>>>
>>>> I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing
>>>> as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past.
>>>> The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on
>>>> python-dev.
>>>>
>>>> Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick
>>>> fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3,
>>>> so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather
>>>> than later.
>>>>
>>>> Jim
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it
>>>>>> up to the next level?
>>>>>> - jim
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
>>>>>> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.3.5
>>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
>>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
>>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.4.3
>>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.4.3
>>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.4.4
>>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.4.4
>>>>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>>>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>>>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
>>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>>> 2.4.2
>>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>>>>>> Supplied Version)
>>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>>>> (OS Supplied Version)
>>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> I concur - my +1 was for a beta
+1 for 3.3.0 beta
Jim
> grisha
>
> On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Fraser wrote:
>
>> I'm not "core" but I think its good practice to officially release
>> this as a beta to the wider community before making it an actual release.
>> I didn't test it because I was waiting for the core vote :-)
>>
>> David
>>
>> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>>> >
>>> > core +1 on releasing it into the wild
>>> >
>>> > grisha
>>>
>>> I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant
>>> by "the next level" either. :)
>>>
>>> Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and
>>> so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release?
>>>
>>> I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing
>>> as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past.
>>> The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on
>>> python-dev.
>>>
>>> Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick
>>> fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3,
>>> so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather
>>> than later.
>>>
>>> Jim
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it
>>>>> up to the next level?
>>>>> - jim
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
>>>>> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
>>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>> 2.4.3
>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>>> 2.4.4
>>>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>>>>> Supplied Version)
>>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>>>>> Supplied Version)
>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gr...@apache.org>.
I concur - my +1 was for a beta
grisha
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Fraser wrote:
> I'm not "core" but I think its good practice to officially release this as a
> beta to the wider community before making it an actual release.
> I didn't test it because I was waiting for the core vote :-)
>
> David
>
> Jim Gallacher wrote:
>> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>> >
>> > core +1 on releasing it into the wild
>> >
>> > grisha
>>
>> I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by
>> "the next level" either. :)
>>
>> Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so
>> on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release?
>>
>> I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as a
>> result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The
>> people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev.
>>
>> Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick fixes
>> for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3, so my
>> inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather than
>> later.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>>
>>>> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up
>>>> to the next level?
>>>> - jim
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
>>>> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
>>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>> 2.4.3
>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python
>>>> 2.4.4
>>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
>>>> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>>>> Supplied Version)
>>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>>> (OS Supplied Version)
>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by David Fraser <da...@sjsoft.com>.
I'm not "core" but I think its good practice to officially release this
as a beta to the wider community before making it an actual release.
I didn't test it because I was waiting for the core vote :-)
David
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> >
> > core +1 on releasing it into the wild
> >
> > grisha
>
> I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant
> by "the next level" either. :)
>
> Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and
> so on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release?
>
> I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing
> as a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past.
> The people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on
> python-dev.
>
> Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick
> fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3,
> so my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather
> than later.
>
> Jim
>
>>
>> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>
>>> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up
>>> to the next level?
>>> - jim
>>>
>>>
>>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
>>> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
>>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
>>> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>>> Supplied Version)
>>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>>> (OS Supplied Version)
>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>>
>>
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
>
> core +1 on releasing it into the wild
>
> grisha
I'm not sure what we're voting on here, and I'm not sure what I meant by
"the next level" either. :)
Is this a vote to give 3.3.0 beta a wider release (apache mirrors and so
on), or a vote to go right to the 3.3.0 final release?
I'm +1 either way. As I recall we didn't get much additional testing as
a result of uploading the betas to the apache mirrors in the past. The
people most likely to chip in with testing are already here on python-dev.
Having the 3.2.x stable branch certainly facilitated releasing quick
fixes for 3.2. There is no reason why we can't do the same with 3.3, so
my inclination is to do an official 3.3.0 final release now rather than
later.
Jim
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
>> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up
>> to the next level?
>> - jim
>>
>>
>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
>> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
>> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>> Supplied Version)
>> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>> (OS Supplied Version)
>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
>> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>>
>
Re: Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by Nicolas Lehuen <ni...@lehuen.com>.
+1 for me too !
Nicolas
2006/12/12, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy <gr...@apache.org>:
>
>
> core +1 on releasing it into the wild
>
> grisha
>
> On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>
> > Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to
> the
> > next level?
> > - jim
> >
> >
> > +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
> > +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
> > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
> > +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
> > +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
> > +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
> > +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> > +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> > +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> > +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
> > +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
> > +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
> > +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
> > +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
> Supplied
> > Version)
> > +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
> > Supplied Version)
> > +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
> > +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
> > +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
> > +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
> >
>
Core vote [Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing]
Posted by "Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy" <gr...@apache.org>.
core +1 on releasing it into the wild
grisha
On Mon, 11 Dec 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to the
> next level?
> - jim
>
>
> +1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
> +1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
> +1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> +1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
> +1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
> +1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS Supplied
> Version)
> +1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
> Supplied Version)
> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
> +1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
>
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
Test results so far, FYI. How long shall we wait until we kick it up to
the next level?
- jim
+1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
+1 Linux Debian 3.1 Sarge, Apache 2.0.54 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-worker), Python 2.5
+1 Linux Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Fedora Core 5 i386, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Fedora Core 6 i386, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Fedora Core 6 x86_64, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
+1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.1
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.0.6, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Ubuntu 6.10, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4c1
+1 Mac OS X (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
+1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
Supplied Version)
+1 Mac OS X (PowerPC), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
Supplied Version)
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.0.58 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.5
+1 Microsoft Windows XP, Apache 2.2.2 (mpm_winnt), Python 2.4
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Eric Brunson <br...@brunson.com>.
+1 Linux Fedora Core 6, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.4
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> The mod_python 3.3-0b tarball is available for testing. Hopefully
> Nicolas will have a chance to create Windows installers for testing in
> the next couple of days.
>
> Here are the rules:
>
> In order for a file to be officially announced, it has to be tested by
> developers on the dev list. Anyone subscribed to this list can (and
> should feel obligated to :-) ) test it, and provide feedback *to
> _this_ list*! (Not the mod_python@modpython.org list, and preferably
> not me personally).
>
> The files are (temporarily) available here:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.tgz
>
> http://people.apache.org/~jgallacher/mod_python/dist/mod_python-3.3.0b.md5
>
>
> Please download it, then do the usual
>
> $ ./configure --with-apxs=/wherever/it/is
> $ make
> $ (su)
> # make install
>
> Then (as non-root user!)
>
> $ make check
>
> Or for you Windows folks
>
> $ cd test
> $ python test.py
>
> And see if any tests fail. If they pass, send a +1 to the list, if they
> fail, send the details (the versions of OS, Apache, Apache-mpm, Python,
> the test output, and suggestions, if any).
>
> Please present your test results in the following format:
> +1 OS version, Apache version (apache mpm), Python Version
>
> For example:
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, Apache 2.0.55 (mpm-worker), Python 2.3.5
>
> Presenting your information in a consistent format will help in
> tabulating the results. You can include additional information in each
> section, just don't use extra commas. There is no need to include the
> mod_python version in this string as that information is available in
> the email subject. Who knows, one day I may actually write a script to
> extract this information automatically. :)
>
> Thank you for your assistance,
> Jim Gallacher
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Jeff Hinrichs - DM&T <je...@dundeemt.com>.
On 12/9/06, Detmar Meurers <dm...@ling.ohio-state.edu> wrote:
> +1 Mac OSX (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
>
+1 FreeBSD 6.1, Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3,1
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Detmar Meurers <dm...@ling.ohio-state.edu>.
+1 Mac OSX (Darwin 8.8.1), Apache 2.2.3 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.2
Re: mod_python 3.3.0 beta available for testing
Posted by Colin Bean <cc...@gmail.com>.
+1 Fedora Core 5 (i386), Apache 2.2.2 (mpm-prefork), Python 2.4.3