[Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating]

[Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de>]

I'm sure you all saw Ant's question.  Anybody remember
why it is the way it is?  We must have had a reason at
the time, but I sure don't remember what it was ;-)

--Thilo

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:53:05 +0000
From: ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org,	antelder@apache.org
To: general@incubator.apache.org, mba@michael-baessler.de
References: <47...@michael-baessler.de>

[...]

i did wonder why the jVinci jar doesn't have a uima- prefix or use the
org.apache.uima package name but it looks fine in the maven repository so i
guess that doesn't matter.

   ...ant

Re: [Fwd: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating]

[Adam Lally <al...@alum.rpi.edu>]

On Dec 13, 2007 12:19 PM, Thilo Goetz <tw...@gmx.de> wrote:
> I'm sure you all saw Ant's question.  Anybody remember
> why it is the way it is?  We must have had a reason at
> the time, but I sure don't remember what it was ;-)
>
> --Thilo
>
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Approve release Apache UIMA 2.2.1-incubating
> Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2007 13:53:05 +0000
> From: ant elder <an...@gmail.com>
> Reply-To: general@incubator.apache.org, antelder@apache.org
> To: general@incubator.apache.org, mba@michael-baessler.de
> References: <47...@michael-baessler.de>
>
> [...]
>
> i did wonder why the jVinci jar doesn't have a uima- prefix or use the
> org.apache.uima package name but it looks fine in the maven repository so i
> guess that doesn't matter.
>
>    ...ant
>

I think it was just that Vinci is a general purpose communication
protocol that could be used for things other than UIMA, it just
happens that the source code lives at the UIMA project.

-Adam