You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by DeGee <de...@hotmail.com> on 2007/04/17 04:57:10 UTC
Assembly not having Strong name.
Hi guys,
I downloaded the Spring.Messaging.NMS package
(Spring.Messaging.Nms-20070320-1632.zip) and tried to register the dlls into
the registry. I could not do so as the following dlls were not strongly
named.
ActiveMQ.dll
NMS.dll
Spring.AOP.dll
Spring.Core.dll
Spring.Data.dll
I am running VS2005 and .net Framework 2.0.
Can anyone give sugguestion on how to resolve the issue please? Any help
will greatly appreciated.
Regards
DeGee
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assembly-not-having-Strong-name.-tf3588553s2354.html#a10028506
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 4/18/07, Oleg Deribas <th...@td.selfip.net> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> James Strachan said the following on 18.04.2007 12:31:
>
> > Anyone fancy volunteering to hack the NAnt scripts to support Strong Names?
>
> I could try to do that.
>
> And, I think, that according to assembly naming guidelines:
> http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2003/04/19/49992.aspx
>
> ActiveMQ.dll
> NMS.dll
>
> should be something like:
>
> Apache.ActiveMQ.dll
> Apache.NMS.dll
Good point :)
How about we work on a 1.0 release of NMS today as things stand ASAP;
then in parallel we work towards a 1.1 release with properly named
assemblies with strong names etc?
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by Oleg Deribas <th...@td.selfip.net>.
Hello,
James Strachan said the following on 18.04.2007 12:31:
> Anyone fancy volunteering to hack the NAnt scripts to support Strong Names?
I could try to do that.
And, I think, that according to assembly naming guidelines:
http://blogs.msdn.com/brada/archive/2003/04/19/49992.aspx
ActiveMQ.dll
NMS.dll
should be something like:
Apache.ActiveMQ.dll
Apache.NMS.dll
--
Oleg
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Anyone fancy volunteering to hack the NAnt scripts to support Strong Names?
On 4/18/07, DeGee <de...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> My problem is that I have a .net project that uses strong named assemblies.
> When I try to import the ActiveMQ NMS assembly, it fails because the
> assemblies supplied were not strongly named.
>
> There are reference assemblies in the package that do not come with source
> codes and are not strongly named, thus when I attempt to create a strongly
> named assembly given the source codes, the build failed.
>
> I am also not able to register the assembly manually using regasm and
> gacutil. I have also tried to convert the dlls to strongly named using
> ildasm and ilasm but without success.
>
> Yup that's the crux of my problem.
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Oleg Deribas-5 wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Hiram Chirino said the following on 17.04.2007 17:55:
> >
> >> What does that mean? How does an assembly get strongly named?
> >
> > There is good explanation here:
> > http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/StrongNameExplained.asp
> >
> > --
> > Oleg
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assembly-not-having-Strong-name.-tf3588553s2354.html#a10055219
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by DeGee <de...@hotmail.com>.
My problem is that I have a .net project that uses strong named assemblies.
When I try to import the ActiveMQ NMS assembly, it fails because the
assemblies supplied were not strongly named.
There are reference assemblies in the package that do not come with source
codes and are not strongly named, thus when I attempt to create a strongly
named assembly given the source codes, the build failed.
I am also not able to register the assembly manually using regasm and
gacutil. I have also tried to convert the dlls to strongly named using
ildasm and ilasm but without success.
Yup that's the crux of my problem.
Thanks :)
Oleg Deribas-5 wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Hiram Chirino said the following on 17.04.2007 17:55:
>
>> What does that mean? How does an assembly get strongly named?
>
> There is good explanation here:
> http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/StrongNameExplained.asp
>
> --
> Oleg
>
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assembly-not-having-Strong-name.-tf3588553s2354.html#a10055219
Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by Oleg Deribas <th...@td.selfip.net>.
Hello,
Hiram Chirino said the following on 17.04.2007 17:55:
> What does that mean? How does an assembly get strongly named?
There is good explanation here:
http://www.codeproject.com/dotnet/StrongNameExplained.asp
--
Oleg
Re: Assembly not having Strong name.
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
What does that mean? How does an assembly get strongly named?
On 4/16/07, DeGee <de...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I downloaded the Spring.Messaging.NMS package
> (Spring.Messaging.Nms-20070320-1632.zip) and tried to register the dlls into
> the registry. I could not do so as the following dlls were not strongly
> named.
>
> ActiveMQ.dll
> NMS.dll
> Spring.AOP.dll
> Spring.Core.dll
> Spring.Data.dll
>
> I am running VS2005 and .net Framework 2.0.
>
> Can anyone give sugguestion on how to resolve the issue please? Any help
> will greatly appreciated.
>
> Regards
> DeGee
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Assembly-not-having-Strong-name.-tf3588553s2354.html#a10028506
> Sent from the ActiveMQ - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com