You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by rb...@covalent.net on 2001/06/28 07:31:26 UTC
httpd-2.0 tagged
Apache 2.0.19 is tagged. I will have tarballs soon-ish. Another message
when they are in http://dev.apache.org/dist/
Ryan
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Re: httpd-2.0 tagged
Posted by Bill Stoddard <bi...@wstoddard.com>.
Yea, looks broken on AIX as well. The child process will not stay up. Left with cgid and
the parent process.
Bill
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:39:47PM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
> >
> > The tarballs are now available. :-)
> >
> > Everybody have at them, and enjoy. I will send e-mail to current-testers
> > immediately.
> >
> > When we are ready to make this a beta, I have the CHANGES file available
> > to put on-line.
>
> -1 (yeah, yeah, non-binding).
>
> Just compiled it with a Mandrake 8.0 box with GCC 3.0. The threaded MPM
> looks completely hosed.
>
> It will start up all of the children, but they are all dead within a
> few seconds. (Only two processes remain...)
>
> My gut tells me that the commit right before the T&R for the scoreboard
> is doing something funky. Sorry I don't have time to examine more
> right now. May have more time tomorrow morning to look at this if
> others can't reproduce this. -- justin
>
Re: httpd-2.0 tagged
Posted by Dale Ghent <da...@elemental.org>.
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
| -1 (yeah, yeah, non-binding).
|
| Just compiled it with a Mandrake 8.0 box with GCC 3.0. The threaded MPM
| looks completely hosed.
|
| It will start up all of the children, but they are all dead within a
| few seconds. (Only two processes remain...)
I'm seeing the same on Solaris 8 now.
the children start, stick around for a few seconds, and then all but one
die from receiving SIGTERM. Any HTTP requests made to the server connect,
but hang after "GET /blah ..." is issued.
A quick truss on a child process shows that it seems to be
(gracefully?) killing itself:
/4: getpid() = 21853 [21848]
/2: signotifywait() = 15
/4: kill(21853, SIGTERM) = 0
/2: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/2: lwp_mutex_wakeup(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/2: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: lwp_mutex_wakeup(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/2: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: lwp_mutex_wakeup(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/2: lwp_cond_signal(0xFF1555C8) = 0
/2: lwp_mutex_wakeup(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/3: lwp_cond_wait(0xFF1555C8, 0xFF1555D8, 0xFF105CA8) = 0
/3: lwp_mutex_wakeup(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/4: time() = 993709078
/3: lwp_mutex_lock(0xFF1555D8) = 0
/3: Received signal #15, SIGTERM, in lwp_sigtimedwait() [caught]
/3: siginfo: SIGTERM pid=21853 uid=60001
/3: lwp_sigtimedwait(0xFFBEF7F4, 0x00000000, 0xFF14F860, 0xFFBEF824) =
15
/3: munmap(0xFDC00000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD70E000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD60C000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD50A000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD408000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD306000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD204000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD102000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFD000000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFCB0E000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFCA0C000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFC90A000, 1056768) = 0
/3: munmap(0xFC808000, 1056768) = 0
/3: llseek(0, 0, SEEK_CUR) = 0
/3: _exit(0)
HTH,
/dale
Re: httpd-2.0 tagged
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 10:39:47PM -0700, rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> The tarballs are now available. :-)
>
> Everybody have at them, and enjoy. I will send e-mail to current-testers
> immediately.
>
> When we are ready to make this a beta, I have the CHANGES file available
> to put on-line.
-1 (yeah, yeah, non-binding).
Just compiled it with a Mandrake 8.0 box with GCC 3.0. The threaded MPM
looks completely hosed.
It will start up all of the children, but they are all dead within a
few seconds. (Only two processes remain...)
My gut tells me that the commit right before the T&R for the scoreboard
is doing something funky. Sorry I don't have time to examine more
right now. May have more time tomorrow morning to look at this if
others can't reproduce this. -- justin
Re: httpd-2.0 tagged
Posted by rb...@covalent.net.
The tarballs are now available. :-)
Everybody have at them, and enjoy. I will send e-mail to current-testers
immediately.
When we are ready to make this a beta, I have the CHANGES file available
to put on-line.
Ryan
On Wed, 27 Jun 2001 rbb@covalent.net wrote:
>
> Apache 2.0.19 is tagged. I will have tarballs soon-ish. Another message
> when they are in http://dev.apache.org/dist/
>
> Ryan
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________________
> Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
> Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
_____________________________________________________________________________
Ryan Bloom rbb@apache.org
Covalent Technologies rbb@covalent.net
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------