You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@commons.apache.org by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> on 2011/12/09 12:20:18 UTC
[Sanselan] release plan?
Hi all,
I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
component?
Than you,
Gary
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by Charles Matthew Chen <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 to a release. Long overdue!
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
> component?
>
> Than you,
>
> Gary
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 9 December 2011 13:53, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 December 2011 13:52, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 9 December 2011 12:10, Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the
>>>> serious
>>>> > issues are now fixed.
>>>>
>>>> The tests are very "noisy" at present - there is a lot of output to
>>>> standard out, which makes it quite tricky to follow the progress of
>>>> the tests.
>>>>
>>>> The debug output should be off by default; it might however be useful
>>>> to make this switchable, rather than deleting it.
>>>>
>>>> Probably sufficient to do this per test class as a static boolean flag.
>>>> If a test case fails, one will need to go into the code anyway, so
>>>> probably not necessary to make the output externally switchable.
>>>>
>>>> Agreed?
>>>>
>>>> > However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
>>>> > first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
>>>> > patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
>>>> > compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
>>>> > early next week, I'll start the release process.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Damjan
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Hi all,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
>>>> >> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
>>>> >> component?
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1. Or, the tests can use log4j... which seems more civilized and reading
>>> and editing code to enable debug output.
>>>
>>
>> Or JUL for that matter.
>
> Should have read the code first - there's actually a Debug class that
> handles all the output, so it's easy to fix this.
Done.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 9 December 2011 13:52, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9 December 2011 12:10, Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi
>>> >
>>> > Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the
>>> serious
>>> > issues are now fixed.
>>>
>>> The tests are very "noisy" at present - there is a lot of output to
>>> standard out, which makes it quite tricky to follow the progress of
>>> the tests.
>>>
>>> The debug output should be off by default; it might however be useful
>>> to make this switchable, rather than deleting it.
>>>
>>> Probably sufficient to do this per test class as a static boolean flag.
>>> If a test case fails, one will need to go into the code anyway, so
>>> probably not necessary to make the output externally switchable.
>>>
>>> Agreed?
>>>
>>> > However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
>>> > first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
>>> > patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
>>> > compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
>>> > early next week, I'll start the release process.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Damjan
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
>>> >> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
>>> >> component?
>>>
>>
>> +1. Or, the tests can use log4j... which seems more civilized and reading
>> and editing code to enable debug output.
>>
>
> Or JUL for that matter.
Should have read the code first - there's actually a Debug class that
handles all the output, so it's easy to fix this.
> G
>
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>>> >>
>>> >> Than you,
>>> >>
>>> >> Gary
>>> >>
>>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 9 December 2011 12:10, Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi
>> >
>> > Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the
>> serious
>> > issues are now fixed.
>>
>> The tests are very "noisy" at present - there is a lot of output to
>> standard out, which makes it quite tricky to follow the progress of
>> the tests.
>>
>> The debug output should be off by default; it might however be useful
>> to make this switchable, rather than deleting it.
>>
>> Probably sufficient to do this per test class as a static boolean flag.
>> If a test case fails, one will need to go into the code anyway, so
>> probably not necessary to make the output externally switchable.
>>
>> Agreed?
>>
>> > However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
>> > first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
>> > patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
>> > compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
>> > early next week, I'll start the release process.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Damjan
>> >
>> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
>> >> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
>> >> component?
>>
>
> +1. Or, the tests can use log4j... which seems more civilized and reading
> and editing code to enable debug output.
>
Or JUL for that matter.
G
>
> Gary
>
>
>> >>
>> >> Than you,
>> >>
>> >> Gary
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
> Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 8:45 AM, sebb <se...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 9 December 2011 12:10, Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the serious
> > issues are now fixed.
>
> The tests are very "noisy" at present - there is a lot of output to
> standard out, which makes it quite tricky to follow the progress of
> the tests.
>
> The debug output should be off by default; it might however be useful
> to make this switchable, rather than deleting it.
>
> Probably sufficient to do this per test class as a static boolean flag.
> If a test case fails, one will need to go into the code anyway, so
> probably not necessary to make the output externally switchable.
>
> Agreed?
>
> > However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
> > first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
> > patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
> > compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
> > early next week, I'll start the release process.
> >
> > Regards
> > Damjan
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
> >> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
> >> component?
>
+1. Or, the tests can use log4j... which seems more civilized and reading
and editing code to enable debug output.
Gary
> >>
> >> Than you,
> >>
> >> Gary
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>
--
E-Mail: garydgregory@gmail.com | ggregory@apache.org
JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: <http://goog_1249600977>http://bit.ly/ECvg0
Spring Batch in Action: <http://s.apache.org/HOq>http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by sebb <se...@gmail.com>.
On 9 December 2011 12:10, Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the serious
> issues are now fixed.
The tests are very "noisy" at present - there is a lot of output to
standard out, which makes it quite tricky to follow the progress of
the tests.
The debug output should be off by default; it might however be useful
to make this switchable, rather than deleting it.
Probably sufficient to do this per test class as a static boolean flag.
If a test case fails, one will need to go into the code anyway, so
probably not necessary to make the output externally switchable.
Agreed?
> However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
> first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
> patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
> compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
> early next week, I'll start the release process.
>
> Regards
> Damjan
>
> On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
>> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
>> component?
>>
>> Than you,
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
Re: [Sanselan] release plan?
Posted by Damjan Jovanovic <da...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Yes, it's time for a release. All tests now pass, and most of the serious
issues are now fixed.
However I did promise a few people their patches would get attention, so
first I would like to review and apply the TIFF performance enhancement
patches by Gary Lucas (SANSELAN-56 to 58), and the TIFF G.3 and G.4
compression patches (SANSELAN-48). Then after that, which is hopefully
early next week, I'll start the release process.
Regards
Damjan
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Gary Gregory <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've a lot of commit activity here recently which is quite welcome.
> What are thoughts on releasing? Can anyone comment on the state of the
> component?
>
> Than you,
>
> Gary
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@commons.apache.org
>
>