You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to proton@qpid.apache.org by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> on 2012/11/29 15:16:39 UTC
Proton 0.3 ETA?
Hi guys,
proton-j has really mad some major advancements in stability/correctness
since the 0.2 release. I'm really happy with the current state of proton's
trunk. What are the chances we can cut a 0.3 release soon?
--
**
*Hiram Chirino*
*Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
*hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
*skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
*
*blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
Re: SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Phil Harvey <ph...@philharveyonline.com>.
Yep, this has been addressed in PROTON-179.
On Dec 5, 2012 2:44 PM, "Rob Godfrey" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes - I'm sure Phil is working on a patch to remove this, the longer term
> solution being to add some sort of cross-platform logging support
>
> -- Rob
>
>
> On 5 December 2012 15:40, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >>
> >>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates
> for
> >>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
> >> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
> >> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
> >> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
> >>
> >
> > BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
> > proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known
> issue?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Phil Harvey <ph...@philharveyonline.com>.
Yep, this has been addressed in PROTON-179.
On Dec 5, 2012 2:44 PM, "Rob Godfrey" <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes - I'm sure Phil is working on a patch to remove this, the longer term
> solution being to add some sort of cross-platform logging support
>
> -- Rob
>
>
> On 5 December 2012 15:40, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> >
> >> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> >>
> >>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates
> for
> >>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
> >> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
> >> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
> >> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
> >>
> >
> > BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
> > proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known
> issue?
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<
> dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org>
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Rob Godfrey <ro...@gmail.com>.
Yes - I'm sure Phil is working on a patch to remove this, the longer term
solution being to add some sort of cross-platform logging support
-- Rob
On 5 December 2012 15:40, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
>>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
>>>
>>
>> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
>> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
>> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
>> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
>>
>
> BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
> proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known issue?
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<de...@qpid.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
Re: SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Rob Godfrey <ro...@gmail.com>.
Yes - I'm sure Phil is working on a patch to remove this, the longer term
solution being to add some sort of cross-platform logging support
-- Rob
On 5 December 2012 15:40, Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
>
>> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>>
>>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
>>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
>>>
>>
>> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
>> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
>> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
>> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
>>
>
> BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
> proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known issue?
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.**org<de...@qpid.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
>
>
SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
>
> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known issue?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
SSL related noise in tests? (was Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?)
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 12/05/2012 01:56 PM, Gordon Sim wrote:
> On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
>> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
>> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
>
> I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
> that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
> added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
> for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
BTW, I'm seeing lots of 'noise' printed to the console when running the
proton-j tests. They seem to all be related to SSL. Is this a known issue?
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Gordon Sim <gs...@redhat.com>.
On 12/05/2012 01:09 PM, Hiram Chirino wrote:
> We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
> ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
I'd like to get the messenger API and implementation in before we do
that. My plan was to try and add in the acknowledgement support that was
added to the C version and then check it all in. If I don't have time
for that, then I would at least check in what is ready now.
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I'd like one fairly soon. I've got a few blockers I'm working on for
> proton-c, but there's definitely fixes/improvements I'd like to get out. I
> think kicking off 0.3 sometime in the next couple of weeks would be good to
> shoot for and doable from my side.
>
> --Rafael
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > proton-j has really mad some major advancements in stability/correctness
> > since the 0.2 release. I'm really happy with the current state of
> proton's
> > trunk. What are the chances we can cut a 0.3 release soon?
> >
> > --
> >
> > **
> >
> > *Hiram Chirino*
> >
> > *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
> >
> > *hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> *
> >
> > *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> > http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> > *
> >
> > *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
> >
>
--
**
*Hiram Chirino*
*Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
*hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
*skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
*
*blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
We getting closer? I would like to start cutting release candidates for
ActiveMQ and I can't do that until proton-j is released.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 10:11 AM, Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> I'd like one fairly soon. I've got a few blockers I'm working on for
> proton-c, but there's definitely fixes/improvements I'd like to get out. I
> think kicking off 0.3 sometime in the next couple of weeks would be good to
> shoot for and doable from my side.
>
> --Rafael
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Hiram Chirino <hiram@hiramchirino.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > proton-j has really mad some major advancements in stability/correctness
> > since the 0.2 release. I'm really happy with the current state of
> proton's
> > trunk. What are the chances we can cut a 0.3 release soon?
> >
> > --
> >
> > **
> >
> > *Hiram Chirino*
> >
> > *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
> >
> > *hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com
> *
> >
> > *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> > http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> > *
> >
> > *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
> >
>
--
**
*Hiram Chirino*
*Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
*hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
*skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
*
*blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>.
I'd like one fairly soon. I've got a few blockers I'm working on for
proton-c, but there's definitely fixes/improvements I'd like to get out. I
think kicking off 0.3 sometime in the next couple of weeks would be good to
shoot for and doable from my side.
--Rafael
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> proton-j has really mad some major advancements in stability/correctness
> since the 0.2 release. I'm really happy with the current state of proton's
> trunk. What are the chances we can cut a 0.3 release soon?
>
> --
>
> **
>
> *Hiram Chirino*
>
> *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
>
> *hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
>
> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> *
>
> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>
Re: Proton 0.3 ETA?
Posted by Rafael Schloming <rh...@alum.mit.edu>.
I'd like one fairly soon. I've got a few blockers I'm working on for
proton-c, but there's definitely fixes/improvements I'd like to get out. I
think kicking off 0.3 sometime in the next couple of weeks would be good to
shoot for and doable from my side.
--Rafael
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> proton-j has really mad some major advancements in stability/correctness
> since the 0.2 release. I'm really happy with the current state of proton's
> trunk. What are the chances we can cut a 0.3 release soon?
>
> --
>
> **
>
> *Hiram Chirino*
>
> *Engineering | Red Hat, Inc.*
>
> *hchirino@redhat.com <hc...@redhat.com> | fusesource.com | redhat.com*
>
> *skype: hiramchirino | twitter: @hiramchirino<
> http://twitter.com/hiramchirino>
> *
>
> *blog: Hiram Chirino's Bit Mojo <http://hiramchirino.com/blog/>*
>