You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Vicki Brown <vl...@cfcl.com> on 2005/03/16 06:27:50 UTC
****SPAM(5.5)**** SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com" ...
SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com", has identified this incoming
email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this
email so you can view it (if it isn't spam).
If you have any questions, contact postmaster@dailyhills.com for details.
Content preview: Does anyone else find this just too absurdly silly for
words? Although I guess it surely does prove the point Jeff Chan made
for URIDNSBL and SURBL - most eloquently in fact :-) >SpamAssassin,
running on "mail.dailyhills.com", has identified this incoming >email
as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this
>email so you can view it (if it isn't spam). >If you have any
questions, contact postmaster@dailyhills.com for details. > >Content
preview: I've been going through a bunch of spam and > blacklisting
domains. However, some of the more frequent offenders are > in the
body of the message. For example, today I found about half a > dozen
porno spams that contained a reference to > http://www.a123s.biz/...
[...] > >Content analysis details: (6.2 points, 5.0 required) > > pts
rule name description >---- > >-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF
record > 2.3 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains an URL in the BIZ top-level domain
> 2.5 RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_51_100 BODY: Razor2 gives confidence level above
50% > [cf: 100] >-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to
1% > [score: 0.0000] > 2.5 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2
(http://razor.sf.net/) > 1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the
SBL blocklist > [URIs: a123s.biz] > 0.4 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL
listed in the AB SURBL blocklist > [URIs: a123s.biz] > 1.5
URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist >
[URIs: a123s.biz] > 3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the
OB SURBL blocklist > [URIs: a123s.biz] > 4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains
an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist > [URIs: a123s.biz] >-8.8 AWL
AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > >---- > > > >
>Return-Path:
><us...@spamassassin.apache.org>
>Envelope-To: <da...@dailyhills.com> >X-Spam-Status: SpamAssassin
failed demos >Received: from mail.apache.org ([209.237.227.199]
verified) > by daypicnic.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) > with SMTP
id 287354 for daveh@dailyhills.com; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:25:19 >-0800
>Received: (qmail 13383 invoked by uid 500); 16 Mar 200 [...]
Content analysis details: (5.5 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
2.3 BIZ_TLD URI: Contains an URL in the BIZ top-level domain
-2.6 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
[score: 0.0000]
1.0 URIBL_SBL Contains an URL listed in the SBL blocklist
[URIs: a123s.biz]
0.4 URIBL_AB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the AB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: a123s.biz]
1.5 URIBL_WS_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the WS SURBL blocklist
[URIs: a123s.biz]
3.2 URIBL_OB_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the OB SURBL blocklist
[URIs: a123s.biz]
4.3 URIBL_SC_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the SC SURBL blocklist
[URIs: a123s.biz]
-4.6 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
Re: [SPAM-TAG] SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com" ...
Posted by Jeff Chan <je...@surbl.org>.
On Tuesday, March 15, 2005, 9:27:50 PM, Vicki Brown wrote:
> Does anyone else find this just too absurdly silly for words?
> Although I guess it surely does prove the point Jeff Chan made for URIDNSBL
> and SURBL - most eloquently in fact :-)
>>SpamAssassin, running on "mail.dailyhills.com", has identified this incoming
>>email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this
>>email so you can view it (if it isn't spam).
>>If you have any questions, contact postmaster@dailyhills.com for details.
Yes, but it's a broken configuration on Dave Hill's mail
server...
Jeff C.
--
Jeff Chan
mailto:jeffc@surbl.org
http://www.surbl.org/