You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@bookkeeper.apache.org by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org> on 2025/04/16 07:18:18 UTC
[PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
lhotari opened a new pull request, #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584
### Motivation
Keeping Netty version up-to-date.
### Changes
- Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119.Final
- Comes with tcnative 2.0.70.Final
- Upgrade netty-transport-native-io_uring to 0.0.26.Final
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809250936
> @lhotari The bk did not use the netty dns resolver, I will use the netty dns resolver instead of the java built-in dns resolver, please see #4585
Although there are benefits in using Netty's DNS resolver, I wonder if this test flakiness is simply due to default DNS caching settings in Java.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari merged PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809230575
> `BookKeeper CI / Replication Tests (pull_request)` CI always fails, because the DNS resolve time is too long, which leads to the test timeout.
@nodece interesting. In a different context, a reporter [in this Pulsar GH discussion](https://github.com/apache/pulsar/discussions/24030) was saying that something changed in Netty DNS resolution in the upgrade.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809365942
I created #4586 to tune the DNS TTL settings for tests and for CI
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "nodece (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nodece commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809259959
In the local network environment, the DNS resolution process takes as long as 15 seconds.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "nodece (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nodece commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809273732
I will test that with your suggestion tomorrow.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809260194
commented at https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4585#issuecomment-2809259544
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "nodece (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nodece commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809081472
`BookKeeper CI / Replication Tests (pull_request)` CI always fails, because the DNS resolve time is too long, which leads to the test timeout.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "lhotari (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
lhotari commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809262676
> In the local network environment, the DNS resolution process takes as long as 15 seconds.
That's possibly due to the default negative DNS cache setting of 10 seconds. Have you tested with these changes: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/issues/4585#issuecomment-2809259544 .
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org
Re: [PR] Upgrade Netty to 4.1.119, tcnative to 2.0.70 and io_uring to 0.0.26 [bookkeeper]
Posted by "nodece (via GitHub)" <gi...@apache.org>.
nodece commented on PR #4584:
URL: https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/4584#issuecomment-2809244339
@lhotari The bk did not use the netty dns resolver, I will use the netty dns resolver instead of the java built-in dns resolver, please see #4585
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@bookkeeper.apache.org
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org