You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch> on 2005/03/25 10:39:48 UTC
[VOTE] Release Transcoders
Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
and other showstoppers).
This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two codebases
to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
Jeremias Maerki
Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by The Web Maestro <th...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Mar 25, 2005, at 1:39 AM, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS
> support
> code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> and other showstoppers).
>
> This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two
> codebases
> to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
Web Maestro Clay
--
<th...@gmail.com> - <http://homepage.mac.com/webmaestro/>
My religion is simple. My religion is kindness.
- HH The 14th Dalai Lama of Tibet
Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by Simon Pepping <sp...@leverkruid.nl>.
+1 from me.
Regards, Simon
On Fri, Mar 25, 2005 at 10:39:48AM +0100, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> and other showstoppers).
>
> This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two codebases
> to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
--
Simon Pepping
home page: http://www.leverkruid.nl
Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by "J.Pietschmann" <j3...@yahoo.de>.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> and other showstoppers).
+1 from me
J.Pietschmann
Re: [VOTE:RESULTS] Release Transcoders
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
Done. Tag is: batik-1_6
On 30.03.2005 18:23:22 Thomas DeWeese wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > We've got 7 +1 and no other votes. The vote passes.
> >
> > Thomas, if you don't have any pending issues for the transcoders I will
> > tag CVS HEAD for you.
>
> Please do.
>
> > On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >
> >>Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> >>Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> >>having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> >>vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> >>HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> >>not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> >>transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> >>code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> >>the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> >>Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> >>and other showstoppers).
> >>
> >>This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two codebases
> >>to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
Jeremias Maerki
Re: [VOTE:RESULTS] Release Transcoders
Posted by Thomas DeWeese <Th...@Kodak.com>.
Hi Jeremias,
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> We've got 7 +1 and no other votes. The vote passes.
>
> Thomas, if you don't have any pending issues for the transcoders I will
> tag CVS HEAD for you.
Please do.
> On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
>>Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
>>Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
>>having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
>>vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
>>HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
>>not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
>>transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
>>code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
>>the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
>>Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
>>and other showstoppers).
>>
>>This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two codebases
>>to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
[VOTE:RESULTS] Release Transcoders
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
We've got 7 +1 and no other votes. The vote passes.
Thomas, if you don't have any pending issues for the transcoders I will
tag CVS HEAD for you.
On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> and other showstoppers).
>
> This will be the last Batik release before we reorganize our two codebases
> to create the XML Graphics Commons area.
Jeremias Maerki
Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by Chris Bowditch <bo...@hotmail.com>.
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
+1 from me too.
> +1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems
> to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues
> preventing a release.
>
> On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
>>Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
>>Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
>>having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
>>vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
>>HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
>>not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
>>transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
>>code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
>>the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
>>Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
>>and other showstoppers).
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by Jeremias Maerki <de...@greenmail.ch>.
+1 from me. The code has been stable over the last few months and seems
to work well for most cases. I also don't see any other open issues
preventing a release.
On 25.03.2005 10:39:48 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Batik is currently preparing for a release (be that 1.5.1 or 1.6).
> Former Batik releases simply contained a fop-transcoder.jar without
> having been released properly. That's why I'm now calling for a formal
> vote for a release of our transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS
> HEAD, we don't publish the code ourselves. That also means that we're
> not talking about releasing the whole codebase here, only the
> transcoders plus their dependencies in our codebase (PDF lib, PS support
> code, fonts and images). When the vote passes this tag must be used by
> the Batik team to create their release. This should ensure that the
> Batik release contains only clean code (meaning without known IP issues
> and other showstoppers).
Jeremias Maerki
RE: [VOTE] Release Transcoders
Posted by "Andreas L. Delmelle" <a_...@pandora.be>.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:dev.jeremias@greenmail.ch]
>
> ... I'm now calling for a formal vote for a release of our
> transcoders. The only thing we do is tag CVS HEAD, ...
(Seems I overlooked this one...)
+1
Cheers,
Andreas