You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Olivier Grisel <og...@nuxeo.com> on 2011/05/11 14:53:35 UTC
OSGi dependency learks in extension package
Hi all,
I noticed that the latest snapshot of
org.apache.clerezza.ext:com.ibm.icu has recently been introducing an
unexpected dependency on scala:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.pom
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.jar
The problem seems to be that com.ibm.icu has a
<Embed-Dependency>*</Embed-Dependency> that embeds the sl4j-api,
sl4j-scala-api and sl4j-simple jars and the SCR introspection of those
jars introduces the runtime dependency on the "scala" package.
Previously, in:
https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110430.150330-267.jar
only the sl4j-api and sl4j-simple jars where embedded hence we did
not observe the problem. Anyway I don't see why this bundle should
embed the sl4j jars. What do you think about making the
<Embed-Dependency>icu4j</Embed-Dependency> explicit to avoid this kind
of problems?
--
Olivier
Re: OSGi dependency learks in extension package
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Olivier,
this fix looks good to me.
I'm trying it out too; if everything still works and there isn't any
objections from others I will commit it in short time.
Tommaso
2011/5/12 Olivier Grisel <og...@nuxeo.com>
> On 11 May 2011 17:23, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module
> > which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts, however I think
> we
> > should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to have a deeper
> look.
> > Tommaso
>
> I have attached a fix for the pom in this jira issue:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-518
>
> I confirm that this fixes the regression we observed on the
> integration tests of Stanbol.
>
> --
> Olivier
>
Re: OSGi dependency learks in extension package
Posted by Olivier Grisel <og...@nuxeo.com>.
On 11 May 2011 17:23, Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module
> which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts, however I think we
> should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to have a deeper look.
> Tommaso
I have attached a fix for the pom in this jira issue:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-518
I confirm that this fixes the regression we observed on the
integration tests of Stanbol.
--
Olivier
Re: OSGi dependency learks in extension package
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
2011/5/11 Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>
> I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module
> which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts,
just forgot to specify the replacing is only for scala based Clerezza
modules
> however I think we should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to
> have a deeper look.
> Tommaso
>
>
> 2011/5/11 Olivier Grisel <og...@nuxeo.com>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I noticed that the latest snapshot of
>> org.apache.clerezza.ext:com.ibm.icu has recently been introducing an
>> unexpected dependency on scala:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.pom
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.jar
>>
>> The problem seems to be that com.ibm.icu has a
>> <Embed-Dependency>*</Embed-Dependency> that embeds the sl4j-api,
>> sl4j-scala-api and sl4j-simple jars and the SCR introspection of those
>> jars introduces the runtime dependency on the "scala" package.
>>
>> Previously, in:
>>
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110430.150330-267.jar
>>
>> only the sl4j-api and sl4j-simple jars where embedded hence we did
>> not observe the problem. Anyway I don't see why this bundle should
>> embed the sl4j jars. What do you think about making the
>> <Embed-Dependency>icu4j</Embed-Dependency> explicit to avoid this kind
>> of problems?
>>
>> --
>> Olivier
>>
>
>
Re: OSGi dependency learks in extension package
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
I think that depends on the recent introduction of the scala slf4j module
which is assumed to replace the "common" slf4j artifacts, however I think we
should consider what Olivier is suggesting, will try to have a deeper look.
Tommaso
2011/5/11 Olivier Grisel <og...@nuxeo.com>
> Hi all,
>
> I noticed that the latest snapshot of
> org.apache.clerezza.ext:com.ibm.icu has recently been introducing an
> unexpected dependency on scala:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.pom
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110511.115838-268.jar
>
> The problem seems to be that com.ibm.icu has a
> <Embed-Dependency>*</Embed-Dependency> that embeds the sl4j-api,
> sl4j-scala-api and sl4j-simple jars and the SCR introspection of those
> jars introduces the runtime dependency on the "scala" package.
>
> Previously, in:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/snapshots/org/apache/clerezza/ext/com.ibm.icu/0.5-incubating-SNAPSHOT/com.ibm.icu-0.5-incubating-20110430.150330-267.jar
>
> only the sl4j-api and sl4j-simple jars where embedded hence we did
> not observe the problem. Anyway I don't see why this bundle should
> embed the sl4j jars. What do you think about making the
> <Embed-Dependency>icu4j</Embed-Dependency> explicit to avoid this kind
> of problems?
>
> --
> Olivier
>