You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to distributedlog-dev@bookkeeper.apache.org by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> on 2017/10/05 03:20:06 UTC
[DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Hi all,
It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
tracking (for BP-9
<https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
happen in Github.
Any thoughts?
- Sijie
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
We could have a VOTE.
But, I think there iff there is no concern or main objection from DISCUSS
thread, we could move to Github via Gtibox without VOTE.
Once done, we just need to do official ANNOUNCE to make sure dev@ at
bookkeeper and dost-log knows about the changes and what to expect.
I am +1 for it.
- Henry
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't we have a vote before we start actually moving stuff?
>
> I'm going to start going through jira now, closing dead stuff, and
> adding labels for stuff that needs to be moved.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
> >>>
> >>> -Ivan
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> > +1
> >>> >
> >>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> >>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> >>> > done.
> >>> >
> >>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in
> github
> >>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> >>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> >>> > into something unmanageable again.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Ivan
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> Yeah,
> >>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >>> >> I am totally +1
> >>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> >>> automatically
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Enrico
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Hi all,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for
> issue
> >>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> >>> think it
> >>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> >>> should
> >>> >>> happen in Github.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Sijie
> >>> >>>
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
We could have a VOTE.
But, I think there iff there is no concern or main objection from DISCUSS
thread, we could move to Github via Gtibox without VOTE.
Once done, we just need to do official ANNOUNCE to make sure dev@ at
bookkeeper and dost-log knows about the changes and what to expect.
I am +1 for it.
- Henry
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 1:27 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> Shouldn't we have a vote before we start actually moving stuff?
>
> I'm going to start going through jira now, closing dead stuff, and
> adding labels for stuff that needs to be moved.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
> >>>
> >>> -Ivan
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>> > +1
> >>> >
> >>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> >>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> >>> > done.
> >>> >
> >>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in
> github
> >>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> >>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> >>> > into something unmanageable again.
> >>> >
> >>> > -Ivan
> >>> >
> >>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>> >> Yeah,
> >>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >>> >> I am totally +1
> >>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> >>> automatically
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Enrico
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Hi all,
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for
> issue
> >>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> >>> think it
> >>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> >>> should
> >>> >>> happen in Github.
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> - Sijie
> >>> >>>
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
Shouldn't we have a vote before we start actually moving stuff?
I'm going to start going through jira now, closing dead stuff, and
adding labels for stuff that needs to be moved.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>>>
>>> -Ivan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
>>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
>>> > done.
>>> >
>>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
>>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
>>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
>>> > into something unmanageable again.
>>> >
>>> > -Ivan
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Yeah,
>>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
>>> >> I am totally +1
>>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
>>> automatically
>>> >>
>>> >> Enrico
>>> >>
>>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
>>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
>>> think it
>>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
>>> should
>>> >>> happen in Github.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Any thoughts?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Sijie
>>> >>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
Shouldn't we have a vote before we start actually moving stuff?
I'm going to start going through jira now, closing dead stuff, and
adding labels for stuff that needs to be moved.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 10:16 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>>>
>>> -Ivan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> > +1
>>> >
>>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
>>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
>>> > done.
>>> >
>>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
>>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
>>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
>>> > into something unmanageable again.
>>> >
>>> > -Ivan
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Yeah,
>>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
>>> >> I am totally +1
>>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
>>> automatically
>>> >>
>>> >> Enrico
>>> >>
>>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Hi all,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
>>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
>>> think it
>>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
>>> should
>>> >>> happen in Github.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Any thoughts?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> - Sijie
>>> >>>
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>>
>> -Ivan
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
>> > done.
>> >
>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
>> > into something unmanageable again.
>> >
>> > -Ivan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Yeah,
>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
>> >> I am totally +1
>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
>> automatically
>> >>
>> >> Enrico
>> >>
>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
>> think it
>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
>> should
>> >>> happen in Github.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Sijie
>> >>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
I'll do the first pass tomorrow.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
>
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>>
>> -Ivan
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > +1
>> >
>> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
>> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
>> > done.
>> >
>> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
>> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
>> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
>> > into something unmanageable again.
>> >
>> > -Ivan
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Yeah,
>> >> I would have sent this email this week...
>> >> I am totally +1
>> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
>> automatically
>> >>
>> >> Enrico
>> >>
>> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi all,
>> >>>
>> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>> >>> tracking (for BP-9
>> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
>> think it
>> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
>> should
>> >>> happen in Github.
>> >>>
>> >>> Any thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> - Sijie
>> >>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > done.
> >
> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > into something unmanageable again.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Yeah,
> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >> I am totally +1
> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> automatically
> >>
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> think it
> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> should
> >>> happen in Github.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Ivan!
>
> Enrico
>
>
> 2017-10-05 8:22 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>:
>
> > btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > > done.
> > >
> > > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > > into something unmanageable again.
> > >
> > > -Ivan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> Yeah,
> > >> I would have sent this email this week...
> > >> I am totally +1
> > >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> > automatically
> > >>
> > >> Enrico
> > >>
> > >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> > >>> tracking (for BP-9
> > >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> > >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> > think it
> > >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> > should
> > >>> happen in Github.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> - Sijie
> > >>>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you Ivan!
>
> Enrico
>
>
> 2017-10-05 8:22 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>:
>
> > btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > > done.
> > >
> > > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > > into something unmanageable again.
> > >
> > > -Ivan
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >> Yeah,
> > >> I would have sent this email this week...
> > >> I am totally +1
> > >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> > automatically
> > >>
> > >> Enrico
> > >>
> > >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> > >>
> > >>> Hi all,
> > >>>
> > >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> > >>> tracking (for BP-9
> > >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> > >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> > >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> > think it
> > >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> > should
> > >>> happen in Github.
> > >>>
> > >>> Any thoughts?
> > >>>
> > >>> - Sijie
> > >>>
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Ivan!
Enrico
2017-10-05 8:22 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>:
> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > done.
> >
> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > into something unmanageable again.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Yeah,
> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >> I am totally +1
> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> automatically
> >>
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> think it
> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> should
> >>> happen in Github.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Ivan!
Enrico
2017-10-05 8:22 GMT+02:00 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>:
> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > done.
> >
> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > into something unmanageable again.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Yeah,
> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >> I am totally +1
> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> automatically
> >>
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> think it
> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> should
> >>> happen in Github.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>.
That is awesome! +1 Thank you, Ivan.
On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 11:22 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> > triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> > done.
> >
> > It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> > periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> > selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> > into something unmanageable again.
> >
> > -Ivan
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Yeah,
> >> I would have sent this email this week...
> >> I am totally +1
> >> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub
> automatically
> >>
> >> Enrico
> >>
> >> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> >>
> >>> Hi all,
> >>>
> >>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> >>> tracking (for BP-9
> >>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> >>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> >>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I
> think it
> >>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities
> should
> >>> happen in Github.
> >>>
> >>> Any thoughts?
> >>>
> >>> - Sijie
> >>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> done.
>
> It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> into something unmanageable again.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah,
>> I would have sent this email this week...
>> I am totally +1
>> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>>> tracking (for BP-9
>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
>>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
>>> happen in Github.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
btw, I'm volunteering to do this.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1
>
> The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
> triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
> done.
>
> It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
> periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
> selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
> into something unmanageable again.
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Yeah,
>> I would have sent this email this week...
>> I am totally +1
>> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
>>
>> Enrico
>>
>> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>>> tracking (for BP-9
>>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
>>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
>>> happen in Github.
>>>
>>> Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> - Sijie
>>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
+1
The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
done.
It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
into something unmanageable again.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah,
> I would have sent this email this week...
> I am totally +1
> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
>
> Enrico
>
> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>> tracking (for BP-9
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
>> happen in Github.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>.
+1
The github flow is much nicer than the jira flow. I suggest we do a
triage on the jira issues, closing stuff that will unlikely never be
done.
It would also be worthwhile for someone to triage the issues in github
periodically, catagorizing, bumping priority, closing stale stuff,
selecting issues for releases, etc. Otherwise it's just going to grow
into something unmanageable again.
-Ivan
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 5:21 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yeah,
> I would have sent this email this week...
> I am totally +1
> Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
>
> Enrico
>
> 2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
>> tracking (for BP-9
>> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
>> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
>> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
>> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
>> happen in Github.
>>
>> Any thoughts?
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Yeah,
I would have sent this email this week...
I am totally +1
Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
Enrico
2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> tracking (for BP-9
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
> happen in Github.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> - Sijie
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Move completely to Github
Posted by Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>.
Yeah,
I would have sent this email this week...
I am totally +1
Maybe we can look for some tool to move open JIRAs to GitHub automatically
Enrico
2017-10-05 5:20 GMT+02:00 Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>:
> Hi all,
>
> It has been more than 3 months after we moved to use Github for issue
> tracking (for BP-9
> <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BOOKKEEPER/
> BP-9+-+Github+issues+for+Issue+Tracking>).
> And we have been successfully released 4.5.0 when using Github. I think it
> is the time to discuss to make JIRA readonly and all the activities should
> happen in Github.
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> - Sijie
>