You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> on 2008/09/14 01:24:15 UTC

ungenerifying iconverter

i am thinking about removing generics from iconverter. if someone
subclasses getconverter() and tries to implement it there are
generic-related warnings which end up in user code...

objections?

-igor

Re: ungenerifying iconverter

Posted by James Carman <ja...@carmanconsulting.com>.

I'm +1 to removing any warnings in user code.

On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 7:24 PM, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i am thinking about removing generics from iconverter. if someone
> subclasses getconverter() and tries to implement it there are
> generic-related warnings which end up in user code...
>
> objections?
>
> -igor
>

Re: ungenerifying iconverter

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.

I think convertors aren't really used in user code anyway (the return
value) so fine by me

On 9/14/08, Igor Vaynberg <ig...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i am thinking about removing generics from iconverter. if someone
> subclasses getconverter() and tries to implement it there are
> generic-related warnings which end up in user code...
>
> objections?
>
> -igor
>

Re: ungenerifying iconverter

Posted by Timo Rantalaiho <Ti...@ri.fi>.

On Sat, 13 Sep 2008, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> i am thinking about removing generics from iconverter. if someone
> subclasses getconverter() and tries to implement it there are
> generic-related warnings which end up in user code...
> 
> objections?

Nope, I tried using the current code and couldn't get this 
working (without warnings) either. Good that you spotted 
that.

  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-1833

Best wishes,
Timo

-- 
Timo Rantalaiho           
Reaktor Innovations Oy    <URL: http://www.ri.fi/ >