You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@commons.apache.org by "Thorsten Schäfer (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/10/01 00:20:24 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (MATH-1034) Add binomial test

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1034?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13782341#comment-13782341 ] 

Thorsten Schäfer commented on MATH-1034:
----------------------------------------

Thanks Phil!

Regarding improvement 1: I tried this in my first implementation attempt, but it lead to wrong results. When I read more about how the test value is calculated, I understood it as follows: your suggested approach would work in a case where p=0.5 as the distribution is then symmetrical. However, for other values this is not the case. For instance, if we test with p=0.99, there's basically no room on the right-side for errors, but a lot of room on the left side. The test tried to capture the most extreme outliners for a given significance level and in this example they will be most likely all on the left side - so just considering one side and doubling should not work. (At least that's what my understanding is now...)

> Add binomial test
> -----------------
>
>                 Key: MATH-1034
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1034
>             Project: Commons Math
>          Issue Type: Wish
>    Affects Versions: 3.2
>            Reporter: Thorsten Schäfer
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: binomialTest.patch, binomialTest.patch
>
>
> A binomial test would be a nice addition to commons-math. I might supply a patch in the near future. I guess the interface should be similar to the other tests, i.e., a method to get the p-value and a method returning a boolean indicating reject/non-reject.
> Is there a policy about using Enumerations in commons-math? For instance, in R you can test two-sided, less or greater. This could be done using an enumeration in Java, but I'm not sure if this is discouraged for backward compatibility reasons...



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)