You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> on 2003/06/24 18:03:02 UTC
Re: [bikeshed] --allow-overwrite ? (was: svn commit: rev 6327 - in trunk/subversion: clients/cmdline include libsvn_client)
Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> writes:
> > Issue #1296: add --force option for svn export, so an exported
> > directory can be overwritten by a subsequent export. Patch from
>
> Should we maybe nip the "force _what_?" question in the bud and just stop
> using --force? Maybe rename this as --allow-overwrite ?
+1. I think --force is used way too generically all over the place.
> Here are the other '--force' users:
>
> delete: force the removal of unversioned items
> merge: dunno what force does here
> move: dunno
Do others agree? I know I've heard other people grumbling about the
overloading of "--force", don't remember who. Anyone wanna file an
issue to rename these switches?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: [bikeshed] --allow-overwrite ? (was: svn commit: rev 6327 - in trunk/subversion: clients/cmdline include libsvn_client)
Posted by cm...@collab.net.
Ben Collins-Sussman <su...@collab.net> writes:
> Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > > Issue #1296: add --force option for svn export, so an exported
> > > directory can be overwritten by a subsequent export. Patch from
> >
> > Should we maybe nip the "force _what_?" question in the bud and just stop
> > using --force? Maybe rename this as --allow-overwrite ?
>
> +1. I think --force is used way too generically all over the place.
>
> > Here are the other '--force' users:
> >
> > delete: force the removal of unversioned items
> > merge: dunno what force does here
> > move: dunno
>
> Do others agree? I know I've heard other people grumbling about the
> overloading of "--force", don't remember who. Anyone wanna file an
> issue to rename these switches?
As long as there's only one meaning per subcommand, I'm fine with
--force. My recent complaints (and changes) were because of an
overlap in meanings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: [bikeshed] --allow-overwrite ? (was: svn commit: rev 6327 - in trunk/subversion: clients/cmdline include libsvn_client)
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org>.
On Tue, Jun 24, 2003 at 04:07:13PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:03, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> writes:
> >
> > > > Issue #1296: add --force option for svn export, so an exported
> > > > directory can be overwritten by a subsequent export. Patch from
> > >
> > > Should we maybe nip the "force _what_?" question in the bud and just stop
> > > using --force? Maybe rename this as --allow-overwrite ?
> >
> > +1. I think --force is used way too generically all over the place.
>
> I'm ambivalent on the main idea.
>
> But if we build this bikeshed, I think we should paint it
> --force-overwrite rather than --allow-overwrite, because I think that
> color would be more intuitive to most users.
Hmm. So if a file isn't there to be overwritten, does it put one in so it
can force an overwrite?
/me ducks
:-)
Maybe a different way to phrase it, is that the option should probably be in
passive voice (--allow-overwrite) rather than active (--force-overwrite).
You let the export do something, rather than make it do something. *shrug*
Mostly, I just want to see --force disappear. The resulting bikeshedded
names are less important to me.
Cheers,
-g
--
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: [bikeshed] --allow-overwrite ? (was: svn commit: rev 6327 - in
trunk/subversion: clients/cmdline include libsvn_client)
Posted by Greg Hudson <gh...@MIT.EDU>.
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 14:03, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> Greg Stein <gs...@lyra.org> writes:
>
> > > Issue #1296: add --force option for svn export, so an exported
> > > directory can be overwritten by a subsequent export. Patch from
> >
> > Should we maybe nip the "force _what_?" question in the bud and just stop
> > using --force? Maybe rename this as --allow-overwrite ?
>
> +1. I think --force is used way too generically all over the place.
I'm ambivalent on the main idea.
But if we build this bikeshed, I think we should paint it
--force-overwrite rather than --allow-overwrite, because I think that
color would be more intuitive to most users.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org