You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> on 2010/08/22 18:14:26 UTC
Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was:
svn commit: r987526 - ...]
Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
for threading to work, no?
Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn
commit: r987526 - ...]
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 17:23, Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
>>> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
>>
>> Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
>> for threading to work, no?
>
> Not with Gmail - changes in subjects are treated as a new
> conversation. -- justin
Yup. And empirical evidence shows that it is not enough. Both Bert and
I responded to the original thread before noting this "new thread" was
related in some way.
Cheers,
-g
Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was:
svn commit: r987526 - ...]
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 14:23:15 -0700:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> >> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
> >
> > Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
> > for threading to work, no?
>
> Not with Gmail - changes in subjects are treated as a new
> conversation. -- justin
<snip/>
Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was:
svn commit: r987526 - ...]
Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote on Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 14:23:15 -0700:
> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
> >> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
> >
> > Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
> > for threading to work, no?
>
> Not with Gmail - changes in subjects are treated as a new
> conversation. -- justin
<snip/>
Re: Upgrade from 1.6 must use the same incremental steps? [was: svn
commit: r987526 - ...]
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <ju...@erenkrantz.com>.
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name> wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 14:11:21 -0400:
>> I wish you wouldn't change the subject line so often.
>
> Why not? It has proper References: and In-Reply-To:. Should be enough
> for threading to work, no?
Not with Gmail - changes in subjects are treated as a new
conversation. -- justin