You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Gerrit Jansen van Vuuren (Updated) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/12/17 20:29:30 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-3653) Lucene Search not scalling

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gerrit Jansen van Vuuren updated LUCENE-3653:
---------------------------------------------

    Attachment: profile_1_d.png
                profile_1_c.png
                profile_1_b.png
                profile_1_a.png

profile_1_[x].png images shows lucene 3.4 used in the sample application App.java profiled using YourKit.

1_a : shows the threads Blocking.
1_b : shows where the threads block. I went through all of the methods and almost all were blocking on SegmentCoreReaders
1_c : Shows the monitors on which the threads are blocking.




                
> Lucene Search not scalling
> --------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-3653
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3653
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Gerrit Jansen van Vuuren
>         Attachments: profile_1_a.png, profile_1_b.png, profile_1_c.png, profile_1_d.png
>
>
> I've noticed that when doing thousands of searches in a single thread the average time is quite low i.e. a few milliseconds. When adding more concurrent searches doing exactly the same search the average time increases drastically. 
> I've profiled the search classes and found that the whole of lucene blocks on 
> org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentCoreReaders.getTermsReader
> org.apache.lucene.util.VirtualMethod
>   public synchronized int getImplementationDistance 
> org.apache.lucene.util.AttributeSourcew.getAttributeInterfaces
> These cause search times to increase from a few milliseconds to up to 2 seconds when doing 500 concurrent searches on the same in memory index. Note: That the index is not being updates at all, so not refresh methods are called at any stage.
> Some questions:
>   Why do we need synchronization here?
>   There must be a non-lockable solution for these, they basically cause lucene to be ok for single thread applications but disastrous for any concurrent implementation.
> I'll do some experiments by removing the synchronization from the methods of these classes.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org