You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Sidney Markowitz <si...@apache.org> on 2021/03/17 21:10:55 UTC
Next steps in the 3.4.5 release
Hi everyone,
It's awfully quiet regarding the testing of 3.4.5-rc2. I'm making some
assumptions in taking the next steps in the final release.
Please, speak up if any of these assumptions are wrong and we should not go on
to a quick 3.4.5 build and vote.
I assume:
1. There are people who have been running branch 3.4 in a production
environment since at least when it was tagged as 3.4.5-rc1 last January (even
though there was no announcement of 3.4.5-rc1 builds)
2. The few commits to two minor issues that were committed since then have
been sufficiently reviewed and are deemed safe.
3. Enough committers do think that what we have in 3.4.5-rc2 is ready for
release so nothing is left in the process except to build 3.4.5 and call for a
release vote.
4. Nobody has a -1 vote against proceeding with release that they can explai
with a technical reason.
I'll give this another two days. If there are no negative responses to
consider, I'll proceed with the next steps in the release by building what we
currently have as 3.4.5.
Regards,
Sidney Markowitz
Chair, Apache SpamAssassin PMC
sidney@apache.org
sidney@sidney.com
Re: Next steps in the 3.4.5 release
Posted by Bill Cole <bi...@apache.org>.
Just to confirm:
I have been running 3.4-HEAD for most of the past year on a small
production system. I am confident that it is solid, and my +1 for the
last vote was to freeze and release.
On 17 Mar 2021, at 17:10, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> It's awfully quiet regarding the testing of 3.4.5-rc2. I'm making some
> assumptions in taking the next steps in the final release.
>
> Please, speak up if any of these assumptions are wrong and we should
> not go on to a quick 3.4.5 build and vote.
>
> I assume:
>
> 1. There are people who have been running branch 3.4 in a production
> environment since at least when it was tagged as 3.4.5-rc1 last
> January (even though there was no announcement of 3.4.5-rc1 builds)
>
> 2. The few commits to two minor issues that were committed since then
> have been sufficiently reviewed and are deemed safe.
>
> 3. Enough committers do think that what we have in 3.4.5-rc2 is ready
> for release so nothing is left in the process except to build 3.4.5
> and call for a release vote.
>
> 4. Nobody has a -1 vote against proceeding with release that they can
> explai with a technical reason.
>
>
> I'll give this another two days. If there are no negative responses to
> consider, I'll proceed with the next steps in the release by building
> what we currently have as 3.4.5.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sidney Markowitz
> Chair, Apache SpamAssassin PMC
> sidney@apache.org
> sidney@sidney.com
--
Bill Cole