You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> on 2024/11/20 14:43:39 UTC
[DISCUSS] Remove client assembly from HBase 3+ ?
I have recently compared the standard and client assemblies on master, and
I found that the differences are miniscule.
AFAICT, there is no added value in providing a separate client assembly
when the contents and size are nearly identical.
Historically, the client artifact seems to have been intended for the
shaded artifacts, but by now both assemblies include almost everything.
WDYT ?
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove client assembly from HBase 3+ ?
Posted by "张铎(Duo Zhang)" <pa...@gmail.com>.
+1 on Nick.
We should try to reduce the size of client artifacts first.
Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org> 于2024年11月21日周四 02:36写道：
>
> Before we do, I would prefer we take another effort at shrinking the client
> assembly. The intention was that it should be smaller, but our tangle of
> hbase-server makes that impractical. However I think this is still a good
> goal for the health of our project.
>
> Thanks,
> Nick
>
> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 15:43, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I have recently compared the standard and client assemblies on master, and
> > I found that the differences are miniscule.
> >
> > AFAICT, there is no added value in providing a separate client assembly
> > when the contents and size are nearly identical.
> >
> > Historically, the client artifact seems to have been intended for the
> > shaded artifacts, but by now both assemblies include almost everything.
> >
> > WDYT ?
> >
Re: [DISCUSS] Remove client assembly from HBase 3+ ?
Posted by Nick Dimiduk <nd...@apache.org>.
Before we do, I would prefer we take another effort at shrinking the client
assembly. The intention was that it should be smaller, but our tangle of
hbase-server makes that impractical. However I think this is still a good
goal for the health of our project.
Thanks,
Nick
On Wed, 20 Nov 2024 at 15:43, Istvan Toth <st...@apache.org> wrote:
> I have recently compared the standard and client assemblies on master, and
> I found that the differences are miniscule.
>
> AFAICT, there is no added value in providing a separate client assembly
> when the contents and size are nearly identical.
>
> Historically, the client artifact seems to have been intended for the
> shaded artifacts, but by now both assemblies include almost everything.
>
> WDYT ?
>