You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Yun Tang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/25 10:23:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11427) Protobuf parquet writer implementation

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16752126#comment-16752126 ] 

Yun Tang commented on FLINK-11427:
----------------------------------

[~zjuguanghu] I just have a curious question which is a bit independent of this topic. Since Flink would treat protobuf message as {{GenericType}} not {{PojoType}}, how you guys use protobuf message when using field names, just as Flink's table API did below?
{noformat}
dataSet.join(another).where("name").equalTo("personName")
{noformat}
Or just use datastream api, and called {{getter}} of protobuf messages?

> Protobuf parquet writer implementation
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-11427
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11427
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Formats
>            Reporter: Guang Hu
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Right now only ParquetAvroWriters exist to create ParquetWriterFactory. We want to implement a protobuf ParquetProtoWriters to create ParquetWriterFactory.  I am happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds good . 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)