You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Yun Tang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/01/25 10:23:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (FLINK-11427) Protobuf parquet writer
implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11427?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16752126#comment-16752126 ]
Yun Tang commented on FLINK-11427:
----------------------------------
[~zjuguanghu] I just have a curious question which is a bit independent of this topic. Since Flink would treat protobuf message as {{GenericType}} not {{PojoType}}, how you guys use protobuf message when using field names, just as Flink's table API did below?
{noformat}
dataSet.join(another).where("name").equalTo("personName")
{noformat}
Or just use datastream api, and called {{getter}} of protobuf messages?
> Protobuf parquet writer implementation
> --------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-11427
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-11427
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Formats
> Reporter: Guang Hu
> Priority: Trivial
>
> Right now only ParquetAvroWriters exist to create ParquetWriterFactory. We want to implement a protobuf ParquetProtoWriters to create ParquetWriterFactory. I am happy to submit a PR if this approach sounds good .
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)