You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@giraph.apache.org by "Eli Reisman (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/10/29 18:00:14 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (GIRAPH-388) Improve the way we keep outgoing messages

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13486151#comment-13486151 ] 

Eli Reisman commented on GIRAPH-388:
------------------------------------

Yeah I orginally did the worker addressing this way and was asked to change it to workerInfo -> PartitionId -> vertId + Collection<M> maps to preserve the partitionId so that its already provided on the receiver side. I think Avery's idea was its too expensive or slow to recalc each vertexId -> partitionId mapping while deserializing incoming message bundles at the receiver. I think the comments are on the 328 thread.

                
> Improve the way we keep outgoing messages
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GIRAPH-388
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GIRAPH-388
>             Project: Giraph
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Maja Kabiljo
>         Attachments: GIRAPH-388.patch
>
>
> As per discussion on GIRAPH-357, in standard application chances that we get to use client-side combiner are very low. I experimented with benefits which we can get from not having the client-side combiner at all. It turns out that having a lot of maps in SendMessageCache, and then collection inside each of them, really hurts the performance. 

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira