You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@maven.apache.org by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> on 2007/08/21 04:38:15 UTC
[vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
another breaks :)
With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
heh, +1 for the record :)
On 21/08/2007, at 3:02 PM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote:
> +1
> Brett, you didn't vote.
>
> Arnaud
>
> On 21/08/07, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
>> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
>> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>>
>> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
>> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
>> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
>> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
>> another breaks :)
>>
>> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
>> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
>> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
>> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
>> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and
>> upgraded.
>>
>> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
>> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
>> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>>
>> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
>> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
>> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
>> deployment.
>>
>> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
>> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> ..........................................................
> Arnaud HERITIER
> ..........................................................
> OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
> www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
> ..........................................................
> ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
> www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
> ...........................................................
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Arnaud HERITIER <ah...@gmail.com>.
+1
Brett, you didn't vote.
Arnaud
On 21/08/07, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
..........................................................
Arnaud HERITIER
..........................................................
OCTO Technology - aheritier AT octo DOT com
www.octo.com | blog.octo.com
..........................................................
ASF - aheritier AT apache DOT org
www.apache.org | maven.apache.org
...........................................................
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Vincent Siveton <vi...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
2007/8/20, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
+1
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
Count me in
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
Definetely +1
CI tool *should* be a part of committer's work.
Cheers,
Vincent
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Stephane Nicoll <st...@gmail.com>.
Sounds good.
+1,
Stéphane
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Large Systems Suck: This rule is 100% transitive. If you build one,
you suck" -- S.Yegge
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Jason van Zyl <ja...@maven.org>.
As long as we're free to evaluate other tools. Since we've never
actually done any comparison I don't want this to be cast in stone or
be the only tool we use. In other words I don't want this mandated.
I'm happy that it is setup, provided I can use Hudons or something
else. Continuum has not been reliable in the past and I don't want
any sort of lock in.
There's nothing wrong with it and I'm +1 running it, provided it
doesn't preclude the use of other tools.
On 20 Aug 07, at 10:38 PM 20 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
> have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
> missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
> been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been
> trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets
> done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
> I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
> current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
> already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and
> we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy
> and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
> be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also
> start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
> deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
Thanks,
Jason
----------------------------------------------------------
Jason van Zyl
Founder and PMC Chair, Apache Maven
jason at sonatype dot com
----------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
[result] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Result: 11 affirmative votes from committers, and a +1 from Hervé
So, we'll consider it live now. Thanks to those who've volunteered to
help ensure it keeps running smoothly, and to those who've been
working to fix broken builds.
If anyone has any feedback on it's effectiveness (particularly if
there are things that should be on the Continuum roadmap), please
yell :)
Cheers,
Brett
On 21/08/2007, at 12:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
> have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
> missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
> been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been
> trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets
> done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
> I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
> current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
> already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and
> we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy
> and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
> be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also
> start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
> deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: Maven 1 CI
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
If it gets committed to again, yeah, you should be able to add it to
the existing instance without any problems under it's own group.
On 21/08/2007, at 5:41 PM, Lukas Theussl wrote:
> Definetely +1. I wouldn't have thought that we need a vote for this...
>
> As a sidenote: Arnaud once had a continuum instance set up for
> maven1, which I don't see anymore. Not that I expect much
> development anymore but just in case, could that be added to the
> project groups on zones?
>
> Thanks,
> -Lukas
>
>
> Brett Porter wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
>> have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have
>> probably missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
>> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
>> been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the
>> plexus container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've
>> been trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one
>> gets done, another breaks :)
>> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
>> I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
>> current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
>> already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring,
>> and we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays
>> healthy and upgraded.
>> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
>> be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of
>> the messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints,
>> and nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can
>> also start to investigate other useful things like automated
>> snapshot deployment.
>> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
>> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1
>> - Brett
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project
infrastructure
Posted by Lukas Theussl <lt...@apache.org>.
Definetely +1. I wouldn't have thought that we need a vote for this...
As a sidenote: Arnaud once had a continuum instance set up for maven1,
which I don't see anymore. Not that I expect much development anymore
but just in case, could that be added to the project groups on zones?
Thanks,
-Lukas
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container
> changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on
> to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up,
> I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of
> volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers
> that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project
infrastructure
Posted by Emmanuel Venisse <em...@venisse.net>.
a bit late, but +1 of course
Emmanuel
Brett Porter a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container
> changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on
> to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up,
> I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of
> volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start to
> investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers
> that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
+1
and it'd be great if it deploys snapshots too :D
On 8/21/07, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by John Casey <jd...@commonjava.org>.
+1, definitely.
-john
On Aug 20, 2007, at 10:38 PM, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
> have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
> missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
> been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been
> trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets
> done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
> I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
> current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
> already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and
> we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy
> and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
> be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also
> start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
> deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
---
John Casey
Committer and PMC Member, Apache Maven
mail: jdcasey at commonjava dot org
blog: http://www.ejlife.net/blogs/john
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project
infrastructure
Posted by Dennis Lundberg <de...@apache.org>.
+1 of course
Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container
> changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on
> to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up,
> I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of
> volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start to
> investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers
> that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
--
Dennis Lundberg
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Andrew Williams <an...@handyande.co.uk>.
+1, deploying to snapshot repo would be good too.
Andy
On 21 Aug 2007, at 03:38, Brett Porter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people
> have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably
> missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't
> been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been
> trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets
> done, another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down,
> I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The
> current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is
> already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and
> we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy
> and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd
> be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also
> start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
> deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: JDKs
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@apache.org>.
Yep, we can flip most of the projects over to use a JDK 1.4 profile,
actually. Will do that after the next software upgrade.
- Brett
On 22/08/2007, at 4:02 PM, Hervé BOUTEMY wrote:
> +1
> but it seems that actual Continuum server is compiling with jdk 1.5
> instead of
> 1.4
> The following build should have failed since the commit makes use of
> String.contains(String) API in CheckDependencySnapshotsPhase class
> see
> http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?
> buildId=16439&projectId=189
>
> Can this be changed, or is there something I'm missing?
>
> Hervé
>
> Le mardi 21 août 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
>> Hi,
>>
>> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
>> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
>> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>>
>> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
>> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
>> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
>> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
>> another breaks :)
>>
>> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
>> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
>> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
>> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
>> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and
>> upgraded.
>>
>> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
>> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
>> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>>
>> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
>> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
>> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot
>> deployment.
>>
>> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
>> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>>
>> [ ] +1
>> [ ] 0
>> [ ] -1
>>
>> - Brett
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
Re: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Posted by Hervé BOUTEMY <he...@free.fr>.
+1
but it seems that actual Continuum server is compiling with jdk 1.5 instead of
1.4
The following build should have failed since the commit makes use of
String.contains(String) API in CheckDependencySnapshotsPhase class
see
http://maven.zones.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=16439&projectId=189
Can this be changed, or is there something I'm missing?
Hervé
Le mardi 21 août 2007, Brett Porter a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have
> been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed
> them, or presumed them erroneous.
>
> There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been
> caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus
> container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying
> off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done,
> another breaks :)
>
> With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm
> confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current
> failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set
> up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a
> couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
>
> I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be
> good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the
> messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
>
> So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and
> nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start
> to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
>
> This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of
> committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
>
> [ ] +1
> [ ] 0
> [ ] -1
>
> - Brett
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
RE: [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project
infrastructure
Posted by LAMY Olivier <Ol...@accor.com>.
+1.
--
Olivier
-----Message d'origine-----
De : Brett Porter [mailto:brett@apache.org]
Envoyé : mardi 21 août 2007 04:38
À : Maven Developers List
Objet : [vote] adopt Continuum instance on zone as part of the project infrastructure
Hi,
Continuum has been running on the zone for a while. Some people have been watching the results vigilantly, but others have probably missed them, or presumed them erroneous.
There are builds that are failing because of errors that haven't been caught (and it's picking up a lot more now due to the plexus container changes). We obviously need a CI solution. I've been trying off and on to fix things, but it seems every time one gets done, another breaks :)
With the exception of the weekend's hiccup due to SVN being down, I'm confident that Continuum is producing accurate results. The current failures all occur on my own development machine. It is already set up, I can add it to the infrastructure monitoring, and we have a couple of volunteers that will make sure it stays healthy and upgraded.
I'm not sure if a vote is the right measure here, but I think it'd be good to get some agreement that we all should take notice of the messages to notifications@maven.apache.org from it.
So, I vote to start paying attention to Continuum's complaints, and nagging people who break things :) If this carries, we can also start to investigate other useful things like automated snapshot deployment.
This is a 72-hour vote, to be carried by simple majority of committers that vote (ie more +1's than -1's).
[ ] +1
[ ] 0
[ ] -1
- Brett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org
This e-mail, any attachments and the information contained therein ("this message") are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you have received this message in error please send it back to the sender and delete it. Unauthorized publication, use, dissemination or disclosure of this message, either in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
**********************************************************************
Ce message électronique et tous les fichiers joints ainsi que les informations contenues dans ce message ( ci après "le message" ), sont confidentiels et destinés exclusivement à l'usage de la personne à laquelle ils sont adressés. Si vous avez reçu ce message par erreur, merci de le renvoyer à son émetteur et de le détruire. Toutes diffusion, publication, totale ou partielle ou divulgation sous quelque forme que se soit non expressément autorisées de ce message, sont interdites.
**********************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@maven.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@maven.apache.org