You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Vladimir Ozerov (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/04/10 14:55:41 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-4669) .NET: Sort binary object
fields
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4669?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15962990#comment-15962990 ]
Vladimir Ozerov edited comment on IGNITE-4669 at 4/10/17 2:55 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------------
[~ptupitsyn], I doubt this is good idea to apply sorting to {{IBinarizable}}. I started discussion on the dev list about that. Let's come to some consensus there at first.
Another question - do we already sort fields for "standard" objects?
was (Author: vozerov):
[~ptupitsyn], I doubt this is good idea to apply sorting for {{IBinarizable}}. I started discussion on the dev list about that. Let's come to some consensus there at first.
Another question - do we already sort fields for "standard" objects?
> .NET: Sort binary object fields
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-4669
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-4669
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: platforms
> Affects Versions: 2.0
> Reporter: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Assignee: Pavel Tupitsyn
> Priority: Critical
> Labels: .NET
> Fix For: 2.0
>
>
> Make sure that fields are sorted by name in all cases:
> * Reflective serializer
> * {{IBinarizable}} serialization
> * {{[Serializable]}} serialization
> * Custom serializer
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)