You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-issues@hadoop.apache.org by "Adrian Petrescu (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/06/15 21:32:09 UTC

[jira] [Created] (HADOOP-13278) S3AFileSystem mkdirs does not need to validate parent path components

Adrian Petrescu created HADOOP-13278:
----------------------------------------

             Summary: S3AFileSystem mkdirs does not need to validate parent path components
                 Key: HADOOP-13278
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-13278
             Project: Hadoop Common
          Issue Type: Bug
          Components: tools
            Reporter: Adrian Petrescu
            Priority: Minor


According to S3 semantics, there is no conflict if a bucket contains a key named {{a/b}} and also a directory named {{a/b/c}}. "Directories" in S3 are, after all, nothing but prefixes.

However, the {{mkdirs}} call in {{S3AFileSystem}} does go out of its way to traverse every parent path component for the directory it's trying to create, making sure there's no file with that name. This is suboptimal for three main reasons:

 * Wasted API calls, since the client is getting metadata for each path component 
 * This can cause *major* problems with buckets whose permissions are being managed by IAM, where access may not be granted to the root bucket, but only to some prefix. When you call {{mkdirs}}, even on a prefix that you have access to, the traversal up the path will cause you to eventually hit the root bucket, which will fail with a 403 - even though the directory creation call would have succeeded.
 * Some people might actually have a file that matches some other file's prefix... I can't see why they would want to do that, but it's not against S3's rules.

I've opened a pull request with a simple patch that just removes this portion of the check. I have tested it with my team's instance of Spark + Luigi, and can confirm it works, and resolves the aforementioned permissions issue for a bucket on which we only had prefix access.

This is my first ticket/pull request against Hadoop, so let me know if I'm not following some convention properly :)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: common-issues-unsubscribe@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: common-issues-help@hadoop.apache.org