You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> on 2011/04/26 19:04:23 UTC
c3 anf i18n
Hi all,
I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
direction yet?
If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Steven Dolg <st...@indoqa.com>.
Am 28.04.2011 16:12, schrieb Peter Hunsberger:
>> However I guess c3 only for is easiest for
>> everyone more familiar with c3. If we have a rewrite I can create the
>> c2.2 wrapper quite easy so I say do the c3 and when finish I do the
>> rest. ;)
>>
>> Basically:
>>
>> AbstractI18n = spring based transformer no deps to either c3/2.2
>>
>> - c3I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c3CorrespondingInterfaces
>> - c2I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c2CorrespondingInterfaces
>>
> Sounds like a plan to me...
>
Sounds like Thorsten and Peter already have an understanding on what and
how to do.
So nothing to do for me...
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Peter Hunsberger <pe...@gmail.com>.
> However I guess c3 only for is easiest for
> everyone more familiar with c3. If we have a rewrite I can create the
> c2.2 wrapper quite easy so I say do the c3 and when finish I do the
> rest. ;)
>
> Basically:
>
> AbstractI18n = spring based transformer no deps to either c3/2.2
>
> - c3I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c3CorrespondingInterfaces
> - c2I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c2CorrespondingInterfaces
>
Sounds like a plan to me...
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 07:56 -0500, Peter Hunsberger wrote:
...
> > Actually it should not that be hard to port the i18n. IMO that is a MUST
> > HAVE featured and was very surprised to not find anything.
> >
>
> I'd agree, if we are going to use C3 in the future we will also need
> this feature. I like your option of having a single Spring based
> transformer that works for both C2.2 and C3 but don't know if it is
> any simpler to do? I'd go with whatever is easiest to do at this
> point...
Basically both alternatives are based on the refactoring to spring.
Meaning remove avalon/excalibur deps the only different is to create a
wrapper class afterwards (to be compatible with 2.2 caching -> adding
some of thos deps again). However I guess c3 only for is easiest for
everyone more familiar with c3. If we have a rewrite I can create the
c2.2 wrapper quite easy so I say do the c3 and when finish I do the
rest. ;)
Basically:
AbstractI18n = spring based transformer no deps to either c3/2.2
- c3I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c3CorrespondingInterfaces
- c2I18n extends AbstractI18n implements c2CorrespondingInterfaces
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Peter Hunsberger <pe...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 4:59 AM, Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:45 +0200, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> > On 27/04/2011 07:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> > > On 26/04/2011 19:04, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
> > >>
> > >> Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
> > >> direction yet?
> > >
> > > You're right, there seems to be nothing in C3 sources related to i18n.
> > >
> > >> If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
> > >
> > > That sounds interesting: how much complex do you see this task? Can
> > > you take care of it? ;-)
> >
> > I have created the issue COCOON3-64 [1] for this: who would like to
> > catch it?
> >
> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-64
>
> Actually it should not that be hard to port the i18n. IMO that is a MUST
> HAVE featured and was very surprised to not find anything.
>
I'd agree, if we are going to use C3 in the future we will also need
this feature. I like your option of having a single Spring based
transformer that works for both C2.2 and C3 but don't know if it is
any simpler to do? I'd go with whatever is easiest to do at this
point...
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Steven Dolg <st...@indoqa.com>.
Am 27.04.2011 11:59, schrieb Thorsten Scherler:
> On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:45 +0200, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>> On 27/04/2011 07:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>> On 26/04/2011 19:04, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
>>>>
>>>> Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
>>>> direction yet?
>>> You're right, there seems to be nothing in C3 sources related to i18n.
>>>
>>>> If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
>>> That sounds interesting: how much complex do you see this task? Can
>>> you take care of it? ;-)
>> I have created the issue COCOON3-64 [1] for this: who would like to
>> catch it?
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-64
> Actually it should not that be hard to port the i18n. IMO that is a MUST
> HAVE featured and was very surprised to not find anything.
>
> I will add a comment to the issue to describe the port, but personally
> will not find time in the next couple of weeks since I will be on the
> road and the i18n support will be an issue for our project if they
> contract the pilot. Our prototype does not have to support i18n for now.
>
> thx for your feedback
>
> salu2
I will definitely have a look at your comment and do the task, if I
understand it (no experience with the previous i18n transformer).
I'll post again in any case...
Thanks,
Steven
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Thorsten Scherler <sc...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 09:45 +0200, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 27/04/2011 07:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> > On 26/04/2011 19:04, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
> >>
> >> Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
> >> direction yet?
> >
> > You're right, there seems to be nothing in C3 sources related to i18n.
> >
> >> If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
> >
> > That sounds interesting: how much complex do you see this task? Can
> > you take care of it? ;-)
>
> I have created the issue COCOON3-64 [1] for this: who would like to
> catch it?
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-64
Actually it should not that be hard to port the i18n. IMO that is a MUST
HAVE featured and was very surprised to not find anything.
I will add a comment to the issue to describe the port, but personally
will not find time in the next couple of weeks since I will be on the
road and the i18n support will be an issue for our project if they
contract the pilot. Our prototype does not have to support i18n for now.
thx for your feedback
salu2
--
Thorsten Scherler <thorsten.at.apache.org>
codeBusters S.L. - web based systems
<consulting, training and solutions>
http://www.codebusters.es/
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 27/04/2011 07:26, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 26/04/2011 19:04, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
>>
>> Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
>> direction yet?
>
> You're right, there seems to be nothing in C3 sources related to i18n.
>
>> If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
>
> That sounds interesting: how much complex do you see this task? Can
> you take care of it? ;-)
I have created the issue COCOON3-64 [1] for this: who would like to
catch it?
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON3-64
--
Apache Cocoon Committer and PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
Re: c3 anf i18n
Posted by Francesco Chicchiriccò <il...@apache.org>.
On 26/04/2011 19:04, Thorsten Scherler wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could not find anything related to i18n/locale in c3.
>
> Did I not look hard enough or did we not have implemented in that
> direction yet?
You're right, there seems to be nothing in C3 sources related to i18n.
> If so should we look into porting the old i18n transformer?
That sounds interesting: how much complex do you see this task? Can you
take care of it? ;-)
--
Apache Cocoon Committer and PMC Member
http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/