You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hive.apache.org by "Chao Sun (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/08 23:05:41 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (HIVE-15489) Alternatively use table scan stats for HoS

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15858665#comment-15858665 ] 

Chao Sun commented on HIVE-15489:
---------------------------------

One issue with the current approach is the JOIN operator we are looking at could be impacted by upstream joins/aggregations

{code}
      M1   M2
       \  /
(JOIN 1) R1     M3
         \     /
          \   R2
           \ /
            R3 (JOIN 2)
{code}
Here there are multiple reduce phases before getting to {{JOIN 2}}, which could affect the data size a lot.
To minimize this inaccuracy, I propose that *we should only use TS stats if there is no RS between the JOIN and all roots reachable from it.*
In the above, {{JOIN 1}} satisfies the condition while {{JOIN 2}} does not.

> Alternatively use table scan stats for HoS
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HIVE-15489
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-15489
>             Project: Hive
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Spark, Statistics
>    Affects Versions: 2.2.0
>            Reporter: Chao Sun
>            Assignee: Chao Sun
>         Attachments: HIVE-15489.1.patch, HIVE-15489.2.patch, HIVE-15489.wip.patch
>
>
> For MapJoin in HoS, we should provide an option to only use stats in the TS rather than the populated stats in each of the join branch. This could be pretty conservative but more reliable.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)