You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Gregg Freeman <GF...@seagullsoftware.com> on 2007/03/21 17:04:06 UTC
Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Hi,
We're using an embedded Apache DS in one of our servers, and have been using 1.0.0-RC4 for a while. I recently (a week or 2 ago), decided to try to upgrade to 1.0.1, but I ran into a problem with some ClassNotFound Exceptions on a new Java5 class.
I just assumed that the 1.0.1 release required Java5, but a recent note on the list made me start to wonder.
So, does 1.0.1 require Java5?
Best Regards,
Gregg
_______________________________________
Gregg Freeman
Director, Development & Services
Seagull Software
Tel: +1 816-272-5610
Mobile: +1 816-695-3924
Email: gfreeman@seagullsoftware.com<ma...@seagullsoftware.com>
Web: www.seagullsoftware.com<http://www.seagullsoftware.com/>
__________________________________
Where SOA and BPM Meet the Mainframe
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Oh ok. We should not be archiving 1.0.x branch until it's EOL hits right?
Alex
On 3/27/07, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 3/27/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Why are we archiving the 1.0.x branch? Emmanuel did you move this?
> >
>
> Nope. Or it was by mistake ... May be when we cleared the central server 2
> weeks ago, but the mirrors should still contain the previous versions.
>
>
>
> --
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 3/27/07, Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Why are we archiving the 1.0.x branch? Emmanuel did you move this?
>
Nope. Or it was by mistake ... May be when we cleared the central server 2
weeks ago, but the mirrors should still contain the previous versions.
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Why are we archiving the 1.0.x branch? Emmanuel did you move this? Or is
someone outside of the
project moving our stuff over?
Alex
On 3/26/07, Christine Koppelt <ch...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> 1.0.0 was moved to the archive, i fixed the website link a few days
> ago. Actually it should be ok now.
> You can find the 1.0.0 release here:
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/directory/apacheds/stable/1.0/1.0.0/
>
> regards
>
> Christine
>
>
> 2007/3/26, Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>:
> > Merci Emmanuel, I'll wait for 1.0.2 and stay on 1.0 for now. BTW, the
> last time I checked, we could not download 1.0 anymore, only 1.0.1.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Gary
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:40 AM
> > > To: Gary Gregory
> > > Cc: Apache Directory Developers List; elecharny@iktek.com
> > > Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
> > >
> > > Gary Gregory a écrit :
> > >
> > > >Hello All:
> > > >
> > > >I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket:
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Gary,
> > >
> > > you were right : I introduced some java 5 pieces of code in 1.0.1, I
> > > guess. It has been fixed, and will be released (1.0.2) very soon. We
> > > have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, so I'm launching the vote for
> > > this new version, hopefully it will be available at the end of next
> week.
> > >
> > > Emmanuel
> > >
> > > PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the source from SVN and
> > > build it.
> > >
> > > Hope it helps !
> >
> >
>
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Christine Koppelt <ch...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Gary,
1.0.0 was moved to the archive, i fixed the website link a few days
ago. Actually it should be ok now.
You can find the 1.0.0 release here:
http://archive.apache.org/dist/directory/apacheds/stable/1.0/1.0.0/
regards
Christine
2007/3/26, Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>:
> Merci Emmanuel, I'll wait for 1.0.2 and stay on 1.0 for now. BTW, the last time I checked, we could not download 1.0 anymore, only 1.0.1.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:40 AM
> > To: Gary Gregory
> > Cc: Apache Directory Developers List; elecharny@iktek.com
> > Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
> >
> > Gary Gregory a écrit :
> >
> > >Hello All:
> > >
> > >I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket:
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > Gary,
> >
> > you were right : I introduced some java 5 pieces of code in 1.0.1, I
> > guess. It has been fixed, and will be released (1.0.2) very soon. We
> > have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, so I'm launching the vote for
> > this new version, hopefully it will be available at the end of next week.
> >
> > Emmanuel
> >
> > PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the source from SVN and
> > build it.
> >
> > Hope it helps !
>
>
RE: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Merci Emmanuel, I'll wait for 1.0.2 and stay on 1.0 for now. BTW, the last time I checked, we could not download 1.0 anymore, only 1.0.1.
Thank you,
Gary
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2007 3:40 AM
> To: Gary Gregory
> Cc: Apache Directory Developers List; elecharny@iktek.com
> Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
>
> Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
> >Hello All:
> >
> >I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
> >
> >
> >
> Gary,
>
> you were right : I introduced some java 5 pieces of code in 1.0.1, I
> guess. It has been fixed, and will be released (1.0.2) very soon. We
> have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, so I'm launching the vote for
> this new version, hopefully it will be available at the end of next week.
>
> Emmanuel
>
> PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the source from SVN and
> build it.
>
> Hope it helps !
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Gary Gregory a écrit :
>Hello All:
>
>I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
>
>
>
Gary,
you were right : I introduced some java 5 pieces of code in 1.0.1, I
guess. It has been fixed, and will be released (1.0.2) very soon. We
have 5 more bugs to fix or to postpone, so I'm launching the vote for
this new version, hopefully it will be available at the end of next week.
Emmanuel
PS: if you are in a hurry, you can just get the source from SVN and
build it.
Hope it helps !
RE: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Gary Gregory <gg...@seagullsoftware.com>.
Hello All:
I ran into this about a month ago and created this ticket: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSERVER-861
Gary
________________________________
From: Emmanuel Lecharny [mailto:elecharny@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:55 AM
To: Apache Directory Developers List
Subject: Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Hi Greag,
no, 1.0.1 is supposed to work well with 1.4. We might have some problem in 1.0.1, so it would be very kind to just fill a JIRA issue to give more information about the problem you have : which is the offending class, which JVM are you using, which version, etc.
I suspect we have introduced a fix in both 1.5.0 and 1.0.1. Is it possible that it's related to Spring 1.2.8 ?
On 3/21/07, Gregg Freeman < GFreeman@seagullsoftware.com <ma...@seagullsoftware.com> > wrote:
Hi,
We're using an embedded Apache DS in one of our servers, and have been using 1.0.0-RC4 for a while. I recently (a week or 2 ago), decided to try to upgrade to 1.0.1 , but I ran into a problem with some ClassNotFound Exceptions on a new Java5 class.
I just assumed that the 1.0.1 release required Java5, but a recent note on the list made me start to wonder.
So, does 1.0.1 require Java5?
Best Regards,
Gregg
_______________________________________
Gregg Freeman
Director, Development & Services
Seagull Software
Tel: +1 816-272-5610
Mobile: +1 816-695-3924
Email: gfreeman@seagullsoftware.com <ma...@seagullsoftware.com>
Web: www.seagullsoftware.com<http://www.seagullsoftware.com/>
__________________________________
Where SOA and BPM Meet the Mainframe
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com<http://www.iktek.com>
Re: Java5 required for 1.0.1?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
Hi Greag,
no, 1.0.1 is supposed to work well with 1.4. We might have some problem in
1.0.1, so it would be very kind to just fill a JIRA issue to give more
information about the problem you have : which is the offending class, which
JVM are you using, which version, etc.
I suspect we have introduced a fix in both 1.5.0 and 1.0.1. Is it possible
that it's related to Spring 1.2.8 ?
On 3/21/07, Gregg Freeman <GFreeman@seagullsoftware.com > wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We're using an embedded Apache DS in one of our servers, and have been
> using 1.0.0-RC4 for a while. I recently (a week or 2 ago), decided to try
> to upgrade to 1.0.1 , but I ran into a problem with some ClassNotFound
> Exceptions on a new Java5 class.
>
> I just assumed that the 1.0.1 release required Java5, but a recent note on
> the list made me start to wonder.
>
> So, does 1.0.1 require Java5?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Gregg
>
> _______________________________________
> Gregg Freeman
> Director, Development & Services
>
> *Seagull Software*
> Tel: +1 816-272-5610
> Mobile: +1 816-695-3924
> Email: * **gfreeman@seagullsoftware.com * <gf...@seagullsoftware.com>
> Web: *www.seagullsoftware.com* <http://www.seagullsoftware.com/>
> *__________________________________*
> *Where SOA and BPM Meet the Mainframe*
>
>
>
--
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com