You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@nifi.apache.org by "Mark Payne (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/05/16 14:18:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (NIFI-5200) Nested ProcessSession.read resulting in outer stream being closed.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5200?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mark Payne updated NIFI-5200:
-----------------------------
         Assignee: Mark Payne
    Fix Version/s: 1.7.0
           Status: Patch Available  (was: Open)

> Nested ProcessSession.read resulting in outer stream being closed.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: NIFI-5200
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NIFI-5200
>             Project: Apache NiFi
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Core Framework
>    Affects Versions: 1.6.0
>            Reporter: Peter Radden
>            Assignee: Mark Payne
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> Consider this example processor:
> {code:java}
> FlowFile ff1 = session.write(session.create(),
>     (out) -> { out.write(new byte[]{ 'A', 'B' }); });
> FlowFile ff2 = session.write(session.create(),
>     (out) -> { out.write('C'); });
> session.read(ff1,
>     (in1) -> {
>         int a = in1.read();
>         session.read(ff2, (in2) -> { int c = in2.read(); });
>         int b = in1.read();
>     });
> session.transfer(ff1, REL_SUCCESS);
> session.transfer(ff2, REL_SUCCESS);{code}
> The expectation is that a='A', b='B' and c='C'.
> The actual result is that the final call to in1.read() throws due to the underlying stream being closed by the previous session.read on ff2.
> A workaround seems to be to pass the optional parameter to session.read of allowSessionStreamManagement=true.
> Is this expected that nested reads used in this way will not work?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)