You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@turbine.apache.org by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at> on 2005/05/13 15:21:09 UTC
[Fwd: Current State of Turbine 2.4.1?!]
Hi folks,
I started to make an experimental branch
+) I released Fulcrum 3.0.0 to have a baseline for tackling Turbine
+) I tagged the CVS HEAD with "TURBINE_2_4_M2_BRANCH"
On this branch
+) I havn't committed anything yet
+) I updated the project.xml to use the released Fulcrum components
+) removed ECM libraries and integrated YAAFI
+) updated the TurbineAvalonComponentService and AvalonComponentService
+) got all JUNIT tests running using the YAAFI container
+) I uploaded the current site to
http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/turbine-2.4-m2/
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Current State of Turbine 2.4.1?!
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:23:15 +0200
From: Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>
Reply-To: Turbine Developers List <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>,
siegfried.goeschl@it20one.at
Organization: IT20one GmbH
To: Turbine Developers List <tu...@jakarta.apache.org>
Hi folks,
today I started to migrate my old Turbine application running on Torque
3.0 and Turbine 2.2. to more actual versions ... :-) ... the big
question is to move to Turbine 2.4.1 M2?
Being adventurous I got the CVS HEAD from the CVS repo ....
1) the build is broken since torque-20041102.134240.jar is nowhere found
2) can someone shed some light on the following statement in the
project.xml regarding the broken Torque dependency "needed for
integrated email, will be replaced by commons-email"?!
3) is it feasable to call a vote for removing ECM and Merlin to be
replaced with YAAFI? I'm dead serious - Turbine 2.4.1 is a dependency
graveyard - I counted 74 JARs needed for the compile whereas 30 of those
JARs belong to ECM and Merlin.
4) I suggest an incremental phase-out of Turbine services already found
at Fulcrum otherwise I'm without any chance to get a M2 running. But I'm
puzzled - a few of Fulcrum services are already included but there is
still the Turbine version around? Is this intentional or an oversight?
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Fwd: Current State of Turbine 2.4.1?!]
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <si...@it20one.at>.
Scott Eade wrote:
> Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
>
>> +) I released Fulcrum 3.0.0 to have a baseline for tackling Turbine
>
>
> I think you need to call for a vote before you can do this.
Well, I tagged the CVS but skipped the vote ... I send out the vote
right now.
>
>> +) I tagged the CVS HEAD with "TURBINE_2_4_M2_BRANCH"
>>
>> On this branch
>>
>> +) I havn't committed anything yet
>> +) I updated the project.xml to use the released Fulcrum components
>> +) removed ECM libraries and integrated YAAFI
>> +) updated the TurbineAvalonComponentService and AvalonComponentService
>> +) got all JUNIT tests running using the YAAFI container
>> +) I uploaded the current site to
>> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/turbine-2.4-m2/
>
>
> What else do people intend adding to 2.4? Because of the deprecation
> rules it would be better to push for a 2.4 final release (via one or
> two release candidates) and then do a 2.4.1 with the changes you
> mention here.
>
I would suggest the other way round - exchanging the Avalon container
under the hood, release a 2.4-M2 and then integrate the other things.
But I'm well aware that this might not be possible hence working on a
branch.
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
> Scott
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: [Fwd: Current State of Turbine 2.4.1?!]
Posted by Scott Eade <se...@backstagetech.com.au>.
Siegfried Goeschl wrote:
> +) I released Fulcrum 3.0.0 to have a baseline for tackling Turbine
I think you need to call for a vote before you can do this.
> +) I tagged the CVS HEAD with "TURBINE_2_4_M2_BRANCH"
>
> On this branch
>
> +) I havn't committed anything yet
> +) I updated the project.xml to use the released Fulcrum components
> +) removed ECM libraries and integrated YAAFI
> +) updated the TurbineAvalonComponentService and AvalonComponentService
> +) got all JUNIT tests running using the YAAFI container
> +) I uploaded the current site to
> http://people.apache.org/~sgoeschl/turbine-2.4-m2/
What else do people intend adding to 2.4? Because of the deprecation
rules it would be better to push for a 2.4 final release (via one or two
release candidates) and then do a 2.4.1 with the changes you mention here.
Scott
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: turbine-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: turbine-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org