You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@tuscany.apache.org by Kallen McInerney <ka...@marketamerica.com> on 2013/08/01 01:40:15 UTC

RE: Still Alive?

We've been using Tuscany 2.0 in production for almost 18 months now.  It was fairly painless to integrate and performed well so we never really had to engage the community.

________________________________
From: Akhil Anil [mailto:akhil.karun@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:18 PM
To: user@tuscany.apache.org
Subject: Re: Still Alive?

Hi Sajjad,

At my workplace, we've implemented Tuscany very recently (just few months back). IMHO Tuscany is very mature and tested. You wont be ruining your application.

On 29 July 2013 23:20, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>> wrote:

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sajjad Daya <sa...@gmail.com>> wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> I'm writing to inquire if Tuscany is still alive, and most importantly, is it still relevant?
>
> From the Tuscany site, I see many references to 2007, and 2008, but not so much after that.
>

Mature projects are less active than new projects which what you see today in Tuscany.

> I am about to start a new SOA project for the cloud, and want to know if I should use Tuscany for my services, or is there something new that has caught the interests of Tuscany patrons?
>

There are several companies utilizing Tuscany as of today, and they have seen little issues with the current functionality. If you need new stuff (e.g. new bindings, etc), then you might be prepared to help, and we will be here to guide.

> As you can imagine, I'm quite concerned about having a large part of our application depend on a technology, that appears to have been abandoned. So any guidance or assistance you can provide would be very helpful.

Agree with you, see comments above.

>
> Thank you for your help!
> Sajjad




--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/



--

Thanks and regards....

May God Bless us!

AkH!L.

http://akhilspassion.blogspot.com

Re: Still Alive?

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
I meant a few years! :-)

Sent from my iPhone 5

On Jul 31, 2013, at 7:43 PM, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Glad to hear that. 
>> 
>> FYI, my former employer has Tuscany in production for a few days now.
> 
> I guess you meant few years, right ?
>  
>> Thanks,
>> Raymond
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Still Alive?

Posted by Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Glad to hear that.
>
> FYI, my former employer has Tuscany in production for a few days now.
>
>
I guess you meant few years, right ?


> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://twitter.com/lresende1975
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Re: Still Alive?

Posted by Raymond Feng <en...@gmail.com>.
Glad to hear that. 

FYI, my former employer has Tuscany in production for a few days now.

Thanks,
Raymond

On Jul 31, 2013, at 4:40 PM, Kallen McInerney <ka...@marketamerica.com> wrote:

> We’ve been using Tuscany 2.0 in production for almost 18 months now.  It was fairly painless to integrate and performed well so we never really had to engage the community.
>  
> From: Akhil Anil [mailto:akhil.karun@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 9:18 PM
> To: user@tuscany.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Still Alive?
>  
> Hi Sajjad,
>  
> At my workplace, we've implemented Tuscany very recently (just few months back). IMHO Tuscany is very mature and tested. You wont be ruining your application. 
>  
> 
> On 29 July 2013 23:20, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Sajjad Daya <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Guys
> >
> > I'm writing to inquire if Tuscany is still alive, and most importantly, is it still relevant?
> >
> > From the Tuscany site, I see many references to 2007, and 2008, but not so much after that.
> >
>  
> Mature projects are less active than new projects which what you see today in Tuscany. 
>  
> > I am about to start a new SOA project for the cloud, and want to know if I should use Tuscany for my services, or is there something new that has caught the interests of Tuscany patrons?
> >
>  
> There are several companies utilizing Tuscany as of today, and they have seen little issues with the current functionality. If you need new stuff (e.g. new bindings, etc), then you might be prepared to help, and we will be here to guide.
>  
> > As you can imagine, I'm quite concerned about having a large part of our application depend on a technology, that appears to have been abandoned. So any guidance or assistance you can provide would be very helpful.
>  
> Agree with you, see comments above. 
>  
> >
> > Thank you for your help!
> > Sajjad
> 
> 
> 
>  
> -- 
> Luciano Resende
> http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> http://twitter.com/lresende1975
> http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
>  
> --
>  
> Thanks and regards....
> 
> May God Bless us!
> 
> AkH!L.
>  
> http://akhilspassion.blogspot.com