You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/05/22 23:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (LUCENE-10586) Minor refactoring in Lucene90BlockTreeTermsReader local variables: metaIn, indexMetaIn, termsMetaIn

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10586?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17540708#comment-17540708 ] 

Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-10586:
---------------------------------------------

+1

> Minor refactoring in Lucene90BlockTreeTermsReader local variables: metaIn, indexMetaIn, termsMetaIn
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-10586
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-10586
>             Project: Lucene - Core
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Tomoko Uchida
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Those three local variables refer to the same {{IndexInput}} object (no clone() is called).
> {code}
> indexMetaIn = termsMetaIn = metaIn;
> {code}
> I'm not sure but maybe there are some historical reasons. I wonder if it would be better to have only one reference for the underlying {{IndexInput}} object to make it a little easy to follow the code.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@lucene.apache.org