You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> on 2007/03/14 04:02:51 UTC
Re: JAX-WS TCK and CXF 2.0 release
legal-discuss: Any chance someone could comment on this that has access to
the TCK license?
Many thanks,
- Dan
On 3/13/07, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
>
> Bozhong Lin wrote:
>
> > we would like to cut 2.0 release sooner without fully passing
> > JAX-WS TCK, and plan to push JAX-WS TCK test into 2.1 release
> > plan. Of course, in CXF 2.0 release note, we will explicitly
> > mention that Apache CXF does NOT claim any JAX-WS compliant
> > yet, like what we did with CXF 2.0 M1 release.
>
> > Is this plan OK to incubator PPMC from legal standpoint?
>
> From a legal standpoint, it should probably be run through legal. I
> haven't
> seen the TCK license for JAX-WS TCK, but does it contain language that
> prohibits use of the package namespace until the TCK is passed?
>
> --- Noel
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
--
Dan Diephouse
Envoi Solutions
http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
Re: JAX-WS TCK and CXF 2.0 release
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
FYI, I recently had a reply from Geir who's the JCP rep to a similar
question over on bsf-dev:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/jakarta-bsf-dev/200703.mbox/%3c71e1b5740703150549p2b0eb58kfe615485afbb69a7@mail.gmail.com%3e
...ant
On 3/14/07, Dan Diephouse <da...@envoisolutions.com> wrote:
>
> legal-discuss: Any chance someone could comment on this that has access to
> the TCK license?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> - Dan
>
> On 3/13/07, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Bozhong Lin wrote:
> >
> > > we would like to cut 2.0 release sooner without fully passing
> > > JAX-WS TCK, and plan to push JAX-WS TCK test into 2.1 release
> > > plan. Of course, in CXF 2.0 release note, we will explicitly
> > > mention that Apache CXF does NOT claim any JAX-WS compliant
> > > yet, like what we did with CXF 2.0 M1 release.
> >
> > > Is this plan OK to incubator PPMC from legal standpoint?
> >
> > From a legal standpoint, it should probably be run through legal. I
> > haven't
> > seen the TCK license for JAX-WS TCK, but does it contain language that
> > prohibits use of the package namespace until the TCK is passed?
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Dan Diephouse
> Envoi Solutions
> http://envoisolutions.com | http://netzooid.com/blog
>