unsatisfied dependencies in jelly demos

[John Farrell <Fa...@cat.com>]

I get unsatisfied dependencies when I try to run the first tutorial. I checked 
the JDBC jar on ibiblio, and it's just not there. Is there any point in 
proceeding with jelly, or should I just go back to ant?

John
----
[john@yellowcake jelly]$ maven demo:swing
 __  __
|  \/  |__ _Apache__ ___
| |\/| / _` \ V / -_) ' \  ~ intelligent projects ~
|_|  |_\__,_|\_/\___|_||_|  v. 1.0-beta-10

Attempting to download commons-digester-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download commons-discovery-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download jdbc-2.0.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download jdbc-2.0.jar.
Attempting to download jms-1.0.2b.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download jms-1.0.2b.jar.
Attempting to download commons-betwixt-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download quartz-SNAPSHOT.jar.
Attempting to download xsdlib-20020414.jar.
WARNING: Failed to download xsdlib-20020414.jar.
The build cannot continue because of the following unsatisfied dependencies:

jdbc-2.0.jar
jms-1.0.2b.jar
xsdlib-20020414.jar

Total time:  15 seconds

Re: [jelly] Re: unsatisfied dependencies in jelly demos

[Paul Libbrecht <pa...@activemath.org>]

On Vendredi, août 8, 2003, at 04:31 Europe/Paris, Henri Yandell wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, John Farrell wrote:
>
>> I get unsatisfied dependencies when I try to run the first tutorial. 
>> I checked
>> the JDBC jar on ibiblio, and it's just not there. Is there any point 
>> in
>> proceeding with jelly, or should I just go back to ant?
>
> Just to make sure you're aware of why you're hitting this problem:
>
> Maven used to support the distribution of jdbc and jms, but as these 
> are
> Sun licensed it was decided that having these on the maven global
> repository was against said licence.
>
> The Jelly tutorial needs updating probably, something that needs 
> jdbc/jms
> is no longer a good example.

I don't think JMS is part of the JDK, or is it ?
(JDBC is, indeed, but is it the last appropriate version?)

> Maybe the new Geronimo [Apache J2EE server] will provide such jars that
> can be on there.


??? I don't think...
The Sun licenses have always been a worry for me and they create these 
kind of effects of "non-distributable jars".

We can already be very happy that Apache Software Foundation has shaken 
Sun enough so that JAXP can be downloaded appropriately with all xerces 
and other xml-using downloads (almost all jakarta libraries for 
example).

I fear the problem will stay eternally.
If there is someone of Sun in here, or of the respective JCP. (of 
JMS?). It would be useful to consider this more closely. At least, a 
formal request should be made for each of these dependencies I think.

Paul

[jelly] Re: unsatisfied dependencies in jelly demos

[Henri Yandell <ba...@generationjava.com>]

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, John Farrell wrote:

> I get unsatisfied dependencies when I try to run the first tutorial. I checked
> the JDBC jar on ibiblio, and it's just not there. Is there any point in
> proceeding with jelly, or should I just go back to ant?

Just to make sure you're aware of why you're hitting this problem:

Maven used to support the distribution of jdbc and jms, but as these are
Sun licensed it was decided that having these on the maven global
repository was against said licence.

The Jelly tutorial needs updating probably, something that needs jdbc/jms
is no longer a good example.

Maybe the new Geronimo [Apache J2EE server] will provide such jars that
can be on there.

Hen