You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to legal-discuss@apache.org by "Jukka Zitting (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/08/08 21:24:14 UTC
[jira] Commented: (LEGAL-24) Scripts, source, and Reciprocal
Licenses
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12740948#action_12740948 ]
Jukka Zitting commented on LEGAL-24:
------------------------------------
Agreed with Henri above, though again with a concern about using the NOTICE file for such remarks.
We may want to encourage projects (that have a build process) to keep such "don't modify" sources in packaged format in svn and source releases, and only unpack them into resulting binaries as a part of the build process.
> Scripts, source, and Reciprocal Licenses
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: LEGAL-24
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LEGAL-24
> Project: Legal Discuss
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: Sam Ruby
>
> The current draft of the Third Party Licensing Policy (0.53) contains the following text under the section concerning Reciprocal Licenses:
> Note that works written in a scripting language without a binary form cannot be included in any ASF product under one of these licenses (see Transition and Exceptions).
> We need to decide if this truly is necessary.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: legal-discuss-unsubscribe@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: legal-discuss-help@apache.org