Rule namespaces

[Jesse Houwing <j....@student.utwente.nl>]

Hey,

with the 22 char rulename limit it is sometimes hard to give the 
rulename itself a meaningful name, especially if the rule includes __ T_ 
and or a ruleset prefix,

I have a few proposals that might be helpful in these cases.

instead of the T_ for testign rules, can't we set up a tflags flag 
"test" that zeros the score.

and instead of a ruleset prefix it would be nice if a namespace could be 
defined in the ruleset. All rules will be prefixed with their namespace 
or could even be ordered by their prefix for logical grouping.

Finally instead of doube __ only a single _ would suffice, but that 
doesn't save as much as theother two. maybe a tflags "hidden" or 
something might work, but that would make the ruleset much longer with 
lots more rules to parse.

Another option is to ignore the __ and the "T_" in the rulename and not 
count it against the rulenamelength. in that case any rule (also rules 
with a name of 22 chars) can be made hidden or testing without having to 
alter the name.

In favor ot the tflags option I'd like to add that these "__" and "T_" 
are actually meta data of the rule and they should not be included in 
the name. They could be included like this: "/http:/i !hidden !testing" 
or something similar.

Jesse