You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@jclouds.apache.org by "TangYong (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/05/24 09:03:20 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (JCLOUDS-88) jclouds:node-list is not in line with nova list while using openstack

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13666037#comment-13666037 ] 

TangYong commented on JCLOUDS-88:
---------------------------------

I guess Affects Version/s: maybe add 1.6.x although I have not still tested.
                
> jclouds:node-list is not  in line with nova list while using openstack
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: JCLOUDS-88
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-88
>             Project: jclouds
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jclouds-karaf
>    Affects Versions: 1.7.0
>            Reporter: TangYong
>             Fix For: 1.7.0
>
>
> [jclouds-karaf result]
> karaf@root> jclouds:node-list
> [id]                                           [location]                                               [hardware]  [group] [status]
> RegionOne/2699a427-6f20-4725-b54f-5fd170ad44a3 1ce52682441c34ad7afde77fb30634211b5ce02884ba54ca0f35ff0a RegionOne/2 null    RUNNING
> [nova list result]
> root@ubuntu:~# nova list
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> |                  ID                  |     Name    | Status |               Networks              |
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> | 2699a427-6f20-4725-b54f-5fd170ad44a3 | cargoTestVM | ACTIVE | private=192.168.22.39, 10.167.157.5 |
> +--------------------------------------+-------------+--------+-------------------------------------+
> Compared with the above result, the following metadata was not displayed,
> 1) Name
> 2) Networks
> [Influence Analyze]
> For an user using jclouds-karaf, 1) and 2) metadata are important, especially 2), by 2) he/she maybe ready to ssh the node etc. We do not wish the user will enter into IaaS again after using cli commands.
> For 1), maybe is not important, however, as a friend display, at least this should be more meaningful than node id.
> Originally, I plan to set Priority is Minor, however, from [Influence Analyse], maybe being Major.
> Needing a vote.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira