You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sling.apache.org by "Carsten Ziegeler (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/03/20 14:01:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (SLING-9187) Allow to provide provisioning model
name and runmodes via feature model folders
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9187?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Carsten Ziegeler updated SLING-9187:
------------------------------------
Fix Version/s: (was: slingfeature-maven-plugin 1.1.20)
Slingstart Maven Plugin 1.9.10
> Allow to provide provisioning model name and runmodes via feature model folders
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SLING-9187
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SLING-9187
> Project: Sling
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Feature Model, Maven Plugins and Archetypes
> Affects Versions: slingfeature-maven-plugin 1.1.18
> Reporter: Karl Pauls
> Assignee: Karl Pauls
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: Slingstart Maven Plugin 1.9.10
>
> Time Spent: 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> With SLING-9179 and SLING-9178 we allowed to provide runmodes with the feature model folders and a default provisioning model name, respectively.
> I think it would be good to allow a provisioning model name per folder similar to what we allow for the runmodes. That would mean we would allow more than one attribute per folder - hence, I think we should switch away from the delimter "|" we used for the runmodes and just reuse the attributed header style we use in OSGi.
> In other words, it would look like:
> <folder>;provisioning.model.name="foo";provisioning.runmodes="author,publish"
>
> I will provide a PR for this - please merge the PR and resolve this issue if you like it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)