You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bloodhound.apache.org by Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> on 2013/03/25 14:57:20 UTC
Combine two tasks into a single GSoC project?
Whilst filing projects for GSoC, I came across these two issues:
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185
https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/233
Am I correct in assuming that they're basically related, could share a
lot of infrastructure and could therefore be combined into a single
project for GSoC?
(N.B.: The absolute deadline for GSoC submissions is Wednesday. I'd
really appreciate a bit of help here.)
-- Brane
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Re: Combine two tasks into a single GSoC project?
Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com>.
On 25.03.2013 15:19, Joachim Dreimann wrote:
> Yes, I believe both are related. I don't believe they are good GSoC
> submissions though because they seem too small in scope even when taken
> together, and plugins already exist for both.
In that case I suggest someone besides Olemis and me goes through the
GSoC candidates and cleans up, because I really don't have enough BH-fu
to do that.
-- Brane
> On 25 March 2013 13:57, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
>
>> Whilst filing projects for GSoC, I came across these two issues:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185
>> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/233
>>
>> Am I correct in assuming that they're basically related, could share a
>> lot of infrastructure and could therefore be combined into a single
>> project for GSoC?
>>
>> (N.B.: The absolute deadline for GSoC submissions is Wednesday. I'd
>> really appreciate a bit of help here.)
>>
>> -- Brane
>>
>> --
>> Branko Čibej
>> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
>>
>>
>
--
Branko Čibej
Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
Re: Combine two tasks into a single GSoC project?
Posted by Joachim Dreimann <jo...@wandisco.com>.
Yes, I believe both are related. I don't believe they are good GSoC
submissions though because they seem too small in scope even when taken
together, and plugins already exist for both.
On 25 March 2013 13:57, Branko Čibej <br...@wandisco.com> wrote:
> Whilst filing projects for GSoC, I came across these two issues:
>
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/185
> https://issues.apache.org/bloodhound/ticket/233
>
> Am I correct in assuming that they're basically related, could share a
> lot of infrastructure and could therefore be combined into a single
> project for GSoC?
>
> (N.B.: The absolute deadline for GSoC submissions is Wednesday. I'd
> really appreciate a bit of help here.)
>
> -- Brane
>
> --
> Branko Čibej
> Director of Subversion | WANdisco | www.wandisco.com
>
>
--
Joe Dreimann | *User Experience Designer* | WANdisco<http://www.wandisco.com/>
@jdreimann <https://twitter.com/jdreimann>
*
*
*Join one of our free daily demo sessions on* *Scaling Subversion for the
Enterprise <http://www.wandisco.com/training/webinars>*
THIS MESSAGE AND ANY ATTACHMENTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL, PROPRIETARY, AND MAY BE
PRIVILEGED. If this message was misdirected, WANdisco, Inc. and its
subsidiaries, ("WANdisco") does not waive any confidentiality or privilege.
If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately and
destroy the message without disclosing its contents to anyone. Any
distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains
by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized. The views and
opinions expressed in this e-mail message are the author's own and may not
reflect the views and opinions of WANdisco, unless the author is authorized
by WANdisco to express such views or opinions on its behalf. All email
sent to or from this address is subject to electronic storage and review by
WANdisco. Although WANdisco operates anti-virus programs, it does not
accept responsibility for any damage whatsoever caused by viruses being
passed.